A Quick Lesson in Asset Forfeiture for Scam Victims

A Commentary on the Process of Recovering Cryptocurrency

Primary Category: Guest Editorial

Author:
Val Harkless, Senior Fraud Analyst/Investigator

About This Article

Cryptocurrency asset forfeiture for scam victims is a challenging process primarily due to limited resources and complex legal procedures. Investigators and agencies face significant hurdles, including a lack of trained personnel, high prosecution thresholds (typically between $300,000 to $500,000), and minimal experience in handling crypto-related investigations.

Asset forfeiture typically falls under three categories: administrative, criminal, and civil judicial, with most major cryptocurrency forfeitures processed through civil judicial actions.

This method does not require a criminal conviction and allows the government to seize assets more effectively, even from criminals outside the U.S. Despite growing efforts and proposed legislation to streamline the process, such as lifting the $500,000 cap for administrative forfeiture, progress remains slow.

The U.S. Treasury Department and law enforcement agencies continue to strategize on combating crypto fraud, including partnerships with private companies for forensic analysis. Meanwhile, educating the public is critical in preventing future victims .

A Quick Lesson in Cryptocurrency Asset Forfeiture for Scam Victims - 2024 - on SCARS Institute ScamsNOW.com - The Magazine of Scams Fraud and Cybercrime

A Guest Editorial: A Quick Lesson in Cryptocurrency Asset Forfeiture for Scam Victims

A SCARS Institute Guest Editorial by Val Harkless, Senior Fraud Analyst/Investigator

This question was asked last week by a victim at the FINRA conference by victims Brian Glick and Jules Peterson. However, it is a question that has been asked many times by victims of crypto crimes especially when their loss is very significant. The best answer is because of RESOURCES. Previously, I worked as a contractor for the FBI’s Asset Forfeiture program for almost a decade. My experience is that this process can be frustrating for investigators, agents, analysts, and victims.

Below are some key points as to the lack of prosecution:

  • Too many victims and not enough staff to conduct crypto investigation searches.
  • Federal agencies have greater priorities and can only handle a select few cases.
  • Some US Attorney’s Offices have placed a minimum threshold to prosecute (usually starting between $300k to $500K to prosecute)
  • Even with the threshold met, they can decline to prosecute in the middle of your case.
  • Local/state law enforcement departments have little to no training and experience with crypto assets/investigations, and the cost of training and Block Explorer licenses (Chainalysis, TRM Labs, QLUE, Elliptic, etc.) are cost prohibitive.
  • It’s just not a priority because they don’t think it’s a big problem.

There are 3 Types of Asset Forfeiture:

Administrative, Criminal, and Civil Judicial. The majority of the major crypto cases that have been successfully prosecuted have been Civil Judicial.

Administrative Forfeiture: Many federal law enforcement agencies are authorized to seize crypto-assets valued at less than or equal to $500,000 at the time of seizure via an admin forfeiture procedure without judicial approval. This is an action against the asset and not a person. If a claim is filed, then the asset must be disposed via criminal forfeiture or civil judicial action.

Criminal Forfeiture: Criminal forfeiture actions are actions against a defendant where only property in which the defendant has a true interest may be forfeited. Note: some crypto forfeiture actions are filed whereas the true owner cannot be identified. Assets totaling $500k or more must be processed via Criminal or Civil Judicial forfeiture.

Civil Judicial Forfeiture: The reason that cryptocurrency forfeitures are processed via the Civil Judicial process is because a legal action is brought against property that was derived from, or used to commit an offense.  No criminal conviction is required, it requires a lower burden of proof and allows the government to reach more property than criminal forfeitures, such as property owned by criminals located outside the U.S. Because Civil judicial forfeiture requires the involvement of the US Attorneys’ Office, it can be difficult to convince them to proceed with prosecution. This is also dependent on the Judicial District and how aggressive they are with prosecuting crypto cases. For example, the District of Massachusetts has been in the news recently with several large-scale disruptions of crypto fraud prosecutions.

Final Thoughts:

In some instances, the investigative agency may be interested in pursuing the case, but may not be able to get a conviction. Need more trained investigators and agencies willing to invest in prioritizing crypto investigations. Future legislation and modification of CAFRA (Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act) could make these investigations less complicated to pursue. It’s been suggested previously that law enforcement could contract with private companies that conduct forensic blockchain analysis to support prosecution and to lessen the burden of in-house staff.

Previously, a panelist at The Digital Chamber spoke about how they were brainstorming ways to “enjoin” assets with the cooperation of VASPS [Virtual Asset Service Providers] as part of investigations to aid law enforcement. Additionally, in 2022, the [United States] Attorney General presented a 61-page report citing the intention to lift the $500,000 cap for cryptocurrency and other digital assets to allow them to be processed through Administrative Forfeiture. To date, I do not think this has been implemented. Also, the US Treasury Department submitted a plan to tackle illicit digital currency investigations.

Right now, as investigators we are doing what we can to educate the public to prevent more [scam] victims. I hope this explanation provides insight into the complicated process of recovering [scam] victims’ assets.

References:

(1) The Role of Law Enforcement in Detecting, Investigating, and Prosecuting Criminal Activity Related to Digital Assets, (Pg. 36) https://www.justice.gov/ag/file/1557146/dl?inline

(2) The Digital Chamber https://digitalchamber.org

(3) DOJ Asset Forfeiture Program https://www.justice.gov/afp

(4) Action Plan to Address Illicit Financing Risks of Digital Assets, https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Digital-Asset-Action-Plan.pdf

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

Did you find this article useful?

If you did, please help the SCARS Institute to continue helping Scam Victims to become Survivors.

Your gift helps us continue our work and help more scam victims to find the path to recovery!

You can give at donate.AgainstScams.org

Important Information for New Scam Victims

If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org

If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

SCARS Resources:

PLEASE NOTE: Psychology Clarification

The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:

  • Diagnosis: The diagnosis of mental, emotional, or brain disorders and related behaviors.
  • Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that focuses on helping individuals to understand and resolve unconscious conflicts.
  • Hypnosis: Hypnosis is a state of trance in which individuals are more susceptible to suggestion. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including anxiety, depression, and pain.
  • Biofeedback: Biofeedback is a type of therapy that teaches individuals to control their bodily functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety, and pain.
  • Behavioral analysis: Behavioral analysis is a type of therapy that focuses on changing individuals’ behaviors. It is often used to treat conditions such as autism and ADHD.
    Neuropsychology: Neuropsychology is a type of psychology that focuses on the relationship between the brain and behavior. It is often used to assess and treat cognitive impairments caused by brain injuries or diseases.

SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.

SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.

SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.

It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX-RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2023 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org