Toxic Empathy, Scam Victims, and Saviors – PART 1

The Danger of Toxic Empathy in Scam Victim Advocacy: When Zealotry Hurts More Than It Helps

Primary Category: Scam Victim Recovery Psychology & Scam Victim Advocacy

Intended Audience: Scam Victims-Survivors / Family & Friends / General Public / Others

Authors:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

Toxic empathy in scam victim advocacy is a dangerous form of over-identification with victims that can hinder recovery rather than support it. While empathy is essential for understanding and helping scam victims, toxic empathy leads advocates to absorb victims’ suffering in a way that distorts reality, fosters dependency, and reinforces a cycle of helplessness. When combined with savior syndrome, some victim advocates position themselves as the sole source of truth and guidance, creating an unhealthy reliance where victims feel they cannot recover without them.

This type of advocacy encourages perpetual outrage, unrealistic expectations of justice, and an inability to move on, often discouraging victims from regaining autonomy or seeking balanced professional help. True victim advocacy should empower individuals to reclaim control, trust themselves again, and work toward structured recovery—not keep them trapped in prolonged emotional distress.

Scam victims must be cautious of toxic advocacy, ensuring that those offering support prioritize healing, independence, and practical steps toward rebuilding their lives rather than perpetuating fear, anger, or reliance on a single advocate.

Part 1 – The Danger of Toxic Empathy in Scam Victim Advocacy: When Zealotry Hurts More Than It Helps

Scam victims, in the aftermath of deception, betrayal, and financial loss, often seek comfort and guidance from those who claim to advocate for their recovery. Victim advocates play a crucial role in providing support, education, and resources to help individuals heal from the trauma of being scammed. However, not all advocacy is helpful. In some cases, zealous victim advocates exhibit toxic empathy—a dangerous over-identification with victims that distorts reality, fosters dependency, and ultimately hinders real recovery.

Toxic empathy, when mixed with savior syndrome (or the Messiah complex), can be particularly harmful. While it may appear compassionate on the surface, it often reinforces victimhood, distorts truth, and impedes the ability of scam victims to reclaim control over their lives. This article explores how overzealous, toxic victim advocacy can be dangerous, how it relates to savior syndrome, and why a more balanced, reality-based approach is necessary for true scam victim recovery.

What Is Toxic Empathy?

Toxic empathy is an excessive or unhealthy form of empathy where a person becomes so emotionally enmeshed with another’s suffering that it leads to self-harm, emotional exhaustion, or enables destructive behaviors. Unlike healthy empathy, which allows for compassionate support while maintaining personal boundaries, toxic empathy absorbs the distress of others to the point where it negatively impacts one’s mental health, decision-making, and sense of self.

Toxic empathy often manifests in situations where an individual feels responsible for fixing or alleviating someone else’s pain, even at their own expense. It can lead to chronic stress, burnout, and codependency, especially in relationships involving manipulation or abuse. In some cases, it enables harmful behaviors, such as continually excusing an abuser’s actions, overextending oneself to “save” someone, or staying in a toxic dynamic out of guilt or obligation.

Scammers, manipulators, and abusers frequently exploit toxic empathy, preying on highly empathetic individuals by making them feel guilty, responsible, or emotionally obligated to help. This is common in relationship scams, financial fraud, and abusive partnerships, where the victim is manipulated into prioritizing the scammer’s or abuser’s needs over their own well-being.

Signs of Toxic Empathy:

• • Feeling personally responsible for solving other people’s problems
  • Being emotionally drained from taking on others’ pain
  • Neglecting your own needs to care for someone else, even at great cost
  • Feeling guilty when setting healthy boundaries
  • Excusing bad behavior or manipulation because of someone’s struggles
  • Feeling an obligation to stay in a harmful relationship to “help” the other person

How to Avoid Toxic Empathy:

• • Set Emotional Boundaries: Recognize that you can care about someone’s pain without absorbing it as your own.
  • Practice Detachment with Compassion: Support others without feeling personally responsible for their healing.
  • Recognize Manipulation: Be mindful of when someone is using guilt or emotional distress to control your actions.
  • Prioritize Self-Care: Your well-being matters just as much as anyone else’s. If helping others is hurting you, reassess your limits.
  • Seek Support: Therapy or support groups can help individuals with high empathy learn to balance their compassion with self-protection.

Toxic empathy, if unchecked, can lead to emotional exhaustion, manipulation, and self-destructive behaviors. Learning to empathize in a healthy, boundaried way allows individuals to support others without sacrificing their own mental and emotional well-being.

When Advocacy Becomes Harmful

Toxic empathy occurs when a person becomes so emotionally entangled with someone else’s pain that they absorb it as their own, leading to irrational decision-making, emotional over-involvement, and harmful enmeshment. Unlike healthy empathy, which provides compassionate support while respecting boundaries, toxic empathy feeds on suffering, often prolonging it instead of helping the victim move forward.

In the world of scam victim advocacy, toxic empathy presents itself as:

• Perpetual outrage: Constantly reinforcing anger, resentment, and hatred toward scammers, law enforcement, or institutions, keeping victims stuck in an emotional cycle of blame rather than helping them heal.
• Over-identification: Advocates projecting their own past experiences onto every victim, assuming that what worked for them is the only path to recovery.
• Encouraging helplessness: Telling victims they will “never fully recover” or that the world is against them, discouraging real steps toward healing and independence.
• Encouraging endless pursuit of justice: Pressuring victims to obsess over tracking down scammers, reporting to authorities with unrealistic expectations, or engaging in vigilante-like behaviors that may put them at further risk.
• Demonizing those who move on: Shaming or invalidating victims who choose to focus on recovery rather than dwelling on punishment or retribution.
• Fostering dependency: Creating a cycle where victims become emotionally dependent on the advocate rather than building their own resilience.

At its worst, toxic empathy in advocacy can trap victims in their trauma, making them feel as though they will never be whole again unless someone else—be it the advocate, law enforcement, or society—fixes everything for them.

The Connection Between Toxic Empathy and Savior Syndrome

Toxic empathy often goes hand in hand with savior syndrome (or the Messiah complex), where an advocate sees themselves as the sole hero capable of rescuing victims from their suffering. This mindset is not about genuine victim empowerment but about the advocate’s need to feel important, validated, or even worshipped for their efforts.

A scam victim advocate with savior syndrome often exhibits the following behaviors:

• Treating victims as powerless: Believing that victims are incapable of recovery without their constant guidance.
• Speaking on behalf of victims: Controlling the narrative rather than allowing victims to express their own experiences and solutions.
• Deflecting criticism: Any disagreement with their methods or approach is labeled as an attack on victims themselves.
• Seeking attention or praise: More concerned with being seen as a hero than with actually helping victims heal.
• Controlling access to recovery resources: Gatekeeping support, discouraging victims from seeking help outside of their group or ideology.
• Encouraging dependency: Making victims feel that their only hope is through the advocate, discouraging independent decision-making.

This is especially dangerous because victims, in their vulnerable state, may cling to such figures out of desperation, believing that this advocate is their only hope. But rather than empowering them, toxic victim advocates keep victims in an extended state of reliance, unable to move forward without their guidance.

How Toxic Empathy and Savior Syndrome Harm Scam Victims

When scam victims encounter an advocate driven by toxic empathy or savior syndrome, the road to recovery becomes more difficult, sometimes even impossible. Here’s how these harmful advocacy patterns damage victims’ chances of regaining control over their lives:

Reinforcing Victimhood Instead of Encouraging Recovery

Toxic advocates often keep victims focused on their pain, anger, and resentment rather than guiding them toward healing. While it’s natural to grieve and feel betrayed, staying stuck in a victim mentality prevents personal growth. Victims who continuously hear that they have been irreparably damaged, that justice will never be served, or that recovery is impossible begin to internalize those messages, making it much harder to move forward.

Exhibiting an Obsession With Revenge or Justice

Scam victims often seek justice, but some toxic advocates fuel an unrealistic pursuit of retribution, encouraging victims to spend all their energy on tracking down scammers, demanding action from law enforcement, or engaging in public smear campaigns. While legal avenues exist, the hard truth is that most scammers will never be caught or punished—and staying locked in the desire for revenge keeps victims emotionally shackled to their trauma.

Invalidating Victims Who Choose to Move On

A major red flag of toxic advocacy is dismissing or shaming victims who decide to prioritize healing over justice. If a scam victim decides to move forward rather than continuing to fight for retribution, they may be seen as “weak” or “giving up” by these advocates. This creates unnecessary guilt and pressure, making victims feel as though they must continue suffering to prove they are strong.

Preventing Victims From Trusting Again

One of the biggest emotional wounds of scam victims is the loss of trust—in themselves, in others, and in the world. Toxic advocates often reinforce extreme distrust, telling victims to never trust anyone again, warning that “everyone is out to get you,” or making broad claims that all relationships are dangerous. This deepens isolation and paranoia, rather than helping victims learn to trust wisely and set better boundaries.

Creating a Codependent Relationship Between Victim and Advocate

Instead of guiding scam victims toward independence and self-sufficiency, toxic empathy creates a loop of dependency, where the victim feels they cannot navigate recovery alone. They may begin relying on the advocate’s approval for every decision, rather than developing their own confidence and resilience.

Distorting Reality and Keeping Victims in Emotional Distress

Savior-mentality advocates often exaggerate threats, conspiracies, or systemic failures, keeping victims in a constant state of fear and anxiety. Instead of offering solutions or pathways to rebuild their lives, they may focus solely on external blame, keeping victims emotionally trapped in the scam long after it ended.

What Real Scam Victim Advocacy Should Look Like

True victim advocacy is not about keeping victims in a cycle of pain but about helping them reclaim their power. Healthy advocates acknowledge the trauma and injustice of scams but also encourage active steps toward healing, recovery, and regaining independence.

A healthy scam victim advocate should:

• Empower victims to take control of their recovery, rather than keeping them dependent.
• Encourage emotional resilience rather than fueling endless anger and blame.
• Provide practical tools for healing such as therapy, structured recovery programs, and financial education.
• Encourage critical thinking rather than emotional reactionism.
• Recognize that each victim’s journey is different and respect different paths to healing.

Beware of Toxic Advocacy

Toxic empathy and savior syndrome, when found in scam victim advocacy, do more harm than good. While true advocates work to empower, educate, and support scam victims, those with toxic empathy create cycles of dependency, outrage, and helplessness. Instead of helping victims heal, they trap them in prolonged suffering, convincing them they cannot move forward without constant validation.

Scam victims must be cautious about who they turn to for support. The best advocates guide victims toward self-sufficiency, personal growth, and practical recovery, rather than keeping them locked in their trauma. The goal of true advocacy should always be to help victims reclaim their sense of agency—not to hold them hostage in pain.

Continue to Part 2

Please Rate This Article

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment above!