Motivated Reasoning – A Cognitive Bias

A Cognitive Bias That Deeply Affects Scam Victims Especially During Recovery

Primary Category: Scam Victim Recovery Psychology

Authors:
•  Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

Motivated reasoning is a cognitive bias where individuals interpret information to align with their desires or beliefs, often at the expense of objectivity.

Scam victims may rely on this bias to ignore red flags during the scam or rationalize decisions that go against their best interests. Even during recovery, motivated reasoning can lead them to overestimate their progress by focusing on minor successes and avoiding deeper emotional work.

Recognizing and addressing this bias is key to making informed decisions and achieving genuine recovery.

Motivated Reasoning - A Cognitive Bias That Deeply Affects Scam Victims Especially During Recovery - 2024 - on SCARS Institute ScamsNOW.com - The Magazine of Scams Fraud and Cybercrime

Motivated Reasoning and Its Impact on Scam Victims, Especially During Recovery

What is Motivated Reasoning?

Motivated reasoning is a cognitive bias where individuals process information in a way that supports their existing beliefs, desires, or emotions rather than seeking objective truth. In other words, people engage in motivated reasoning to align facts with what they want to believe, ignoring or discounting evidence that challenges their views. This bias can be particularly harmful to scam victims, as it can prevent them from recognizing the warning signs of a scam, acknowledging that they have been deceived, or making sound decisions to recover from the experience.

What Happens in the Brain During Motivated Reasoning?

Motivated reasoning is driven by emotional responses in the brain, particularly involving areas like the amygdala, which processes emotions such as fear, anger, and hope, and the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for decision-making and reasoning. When someone encounters information that aligns with their desires or beliefs, the brain rewards them with a sense of comfort or pleasure. This reaction is related to the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter linked to feelings of satisfaction.

On the other hand, when confronted with information that contradicts their beliefs or expectations, individuals experience discomfort or cognitive dissonance. The brain’s natural response is to minimize this discomfort by dismissing or rationalizing away the contradictory information. As a result, people engaged in motivated reasoning are more likely to favor emotionally satisfying outcomes, even when those outcomes are objectively incorrect or harmful.

How the Mind Uses Motivated Reasoning

When a person is motivated to believe in a particular outcome—such as the belief that a romantic relationship initiated online is genuine or that a financial opportunity is legitimate—they will subconsciously seek out and interpret evidence that confirms this belief. Motivated reasoning influences how the mind processes information by:

  1. Confirmation Bias: People tend to seek out information that supports their existing beliefs and ignore or minimize evidence that contradicts them. For example, a scam victim may overlook red flags in a scammer’s behavior because they want to believe the person is trustworthy.
  2. Disconfirmation Bias: This occurs when individuals actively challenge and discredit evidence that goes against their desired conclusion. A victim might dismiss warnings from friends or family, insisting that their relationship or investment is real despite clear evidence to the contrary.
  3. Selective Memory: The mind can selectively remember information that supports desired outcomes while forgetting or downplaying contradictory information. This allows individuals to create a narrative that aligns with their beliefs, making it harder to recognize the scam.

A Cognitive Bias

In addition to Motivated Reasoning being a cognitive bias itself, it also works with other cognitive biases like optimism bias and sunk cost fallacy play significant roles in motivated reasoning. Optimism bias leads people to believe that they are less likely than others to experience negative outcomes. This bias can cause scam victims to believe they are too smart to be scammed, even when they are in the middle of one.

The sunk cost fallacy, on the other hand, occurs when individuals continue to invest in a losing situation because they have already committed resources (time, money, or emotion). Scam victims often fall prey to this bias, rationalizing that they need to continue with the scam to recover their investment, rather than cutting their losses.

How Scam Victims Experience Motivated Reasoning

Scam victims are often driven by hope, fear, or a sense of desperation, which fuels their motivated reasoning. Whether they are involved in a romance scam or a financial scam, victims may cling to the idea that they will eventually receive what was promised to them—love, money, or success. The emotional investment they have made in the scam clouds their ability to objectively evaluate the situation. As a result, they may downplay red flags, trust the scammer’s excuses, and continue investing resources even when others advise them to stop.

Motivated Reasoning in Scam Victims’ Recovery

Scam victims often use motivated reasoning to assess their progress in recovery, interpreting information in a way that reinforces their emotional desires or expectations.

For example, a victim might overestimate their progress by focusing on small achievements while ignoring larger unresolved issues, such as lingering trust issues or ongoing financial distress. This biased evaluation can create a false sense of progress, preventing them from addressing core emotional wounds or seeking further help.

Additionally, motivated reasoning may lead victims to avoid difficult emotional work by convincing themselves that they have moved past the trauma when they are still profoundly affected. They might selectively remember moments of strength and resilience while downplaying (equivocating or minimizing) episodes of anxiety, fear, or frustration.

This cognitive bias prevents honest self-assessment, making it harder for victims to fully confront their emotional scars and truly heal from the experience. Recognizing these tendencies is essential for genuine recovery, ensuring that scam victims don’t fall into the trap of superficial progress.

Recognizing Motivated Reasoning

Identifying when you are thinking with motivated reasoning is challenging, especially in emotionally charged situations. Here are some signs that you may be engaging in this cognitive bias:

  1. Ignoring Contradictory Evidence: If you find yourself dismissing or avoiding information that contradicts what you want to believe, this may be a sign of motivated reasoning.
  2. Overvaluing Supporting Evidence: Pay attention to whether you are placing too much importance on information that confirms your beliefs while neglecting critical analysis.
  3. Rationalizing Red Flags: If you find yourself making excuses for behaviors or situations that should raise concern, you may be rationalizing to maintain your emotional comfort.
  4. Feeling Defensive: A strong emotional reaction to criticism or questions about your decision-making, especially when you feel the need to defend your choices, can indicate motivated reasoning.

How to Avoid Motivated Reasoning

Overcoming motivated reasoning requires conscious effort and self-awareness. Here are some strategies to help avoid falling into this cognitive trap:

  1. Seek Diverse Perspectives: Actively listen to feedback from others, even if it’s uncomfortable. Friends, family, or professionals may see things more objectively and can offer valuable insights.
  2. Challenge Your Assumptions: Regularly question your own beliefs and the reasons behind your decisions. Ask yourself, “Am I choosing to believe this because it’s true, or because I want it to be true?”
  3. Look for Disconfirming Evidence: Instead of focusing only on information that supports your beliefs, actively seek out evidence that contradicts them. This will help you make more balanced, informed decisions.
  4. Take a Step Back: In emotionally charged situations, it’s important to take time to process information. Stepping away from the situation allows you to approach it with a clearer, more objective mindset.
  5. Consider the Risks: Focus on the potential risks of your decisions, not just the rewards. Evaluating the consequences of being wrong can help you make more rational choices.

Summary

Motivated reasoning is a powerful cognitive bias that can distort judgment, particularly in emotionally charged situations like scams. By understanding how motivated reasoning works and recognizing its signs, scam victims can take steps to avoid it and make more objective decisions. Seeking out diverse perspectives, questioning assumptions, and considering risks are all essential in overcoming this cognitive bias and protecting oneself from further harm.

Motivated Reasoning - A Cognitive Bias That Deeply Affects Scam Victims Especially During Recovery - 2024 - on SCARS Institute ScamsNOW.com - The Magazine of Scams Fraud and Cybercrime

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

Did you find this article useful?

If you did, please help the SCARS Institute to continue helping Scam Victims to become Survivors.

Your gift helps us continue our work and help more scam victims to find the path to recovery!

You can give at donate.AgainstScams.org

Important Information for New Scam Victims

If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org

If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

SCARS Resources:

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

PLEASE NOTE: Psychology Clarification

The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:

  • Diagnosis: The diagnosis of mental, emotional, or brain disorders and related behaviors.
  • Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that focuses on helping individuals to understand and resolve unconscious conflicts.
  • Hypnosis: Hypnosis is a state of trance in which individuals are more susceptible to suggestion. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including anxiety, depression, and pain.
  • Biofeedback: Biofeedback is a type of therapy that teaches individuals to control their bodily functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety, and pain.
  • Behavioral analysis: Behavioral analysis is a type of therapy that focuses on changing individuals’ behaviors. It is often used to treat conditions such as autism and ADHD.
    Neuropsychology: Neuropsychology is a type of psychology that focuses on the relationship between the brain and behavior. It is often used to assess and treat cognitive impairments caused by brain injuries or diseases.

SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.

SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.

SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.

It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX-RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2023 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org