Organisations Telling Users To ‘Avoid Clicking Bad Links’ Still Isn’t Working
By David C., Technical Director for Platforms Research and Principal Architect – UK National Cyber Security Centre
A New Approach To Cyber Threats
Why Organisations Should Avoid ‘Blame And Fear’, And Instead Use Technical Measures To Manage The Threat From Phishing Links.
Organisations: If It’s Broken, Let’s Fix It
Let’s start with a basic premise: several of the established tenets in security simply don’t work.
One example is advising users not to click on bad links. Users frequently need to click on links from unfamiliar domains to do their job, and being able to spot a phish is not their job. The NCSC carries out and reviews red team operations, and a common observation is that red teamers (and indeed criminals or hostile states) only need one person to fall for a ruse for an attacker to access a network.
We’re even aware of some cases where people have forwarded suspicious emails from their home accounts to their work accounts, assuming that the security measures in place in their organisations will protect them. And once a link in a phishing email is clicked and an attack launches, the stigma of clicking can prevent people reporting it, which then delays the incident response.
So, what if we assume that users will sometimes, completely unintentionally, click on bad links and that when they’re at work, it’s their organisations that are responsible for protecting them?
The Consequences Of ‘Bad Links’ In Organisations
Let’s first consider what happens when someone clicks on a ‘bad link’ in an email. One of two things generally happens:
- the user is persuaded to enter their log-in details into a fake page, so attackers can steal or exploit their credentials, or by using OAuth or consent phishing
- the user downloads a malicious file via a link or attachment, such as a document, executable or script
Note that although browser exploits may also be a consequence of clicking on a bad link, it’s less common and only in high-end attacks. (And if you’ve automated browser patching, only zero day exploits – which are outside the threat model for most organisations – should be a concern here.)
Mitigating Credential Theft For Organisational Services
Although attackers are very good at designing phishing pages to look genuine, your organisation can entirely mitigate the threat of credential theft by mandating strong authentication across its services, such as device-based passwordless authentication with a FIDO token. Or, if your organisation isn’t ready for passwordless authentication, you can make it much harder for actors to exploit credentials by setting up multi-factor authentication (MFA). You can then use single sign-on (SSO) for any third-party websites your organisation’s uses, which gives confidence that controls are widely applied.
For websites outside of your control, encouraging your users to use password managers and allowing autocompletion of passwords in browsers can help. A password manager in a browser shouldn’t provide a password for an incorrect site (although a user might still be persuaded to manually enter a password). Employees should also be encouraged to enable MFA on any services they use.
Organisations can also reduce the risk of credential abuse by making sure that only your organisation’s devices can access resources, or by denying OAuth/consent phishing to arbitrary sites at cloud tenancy levels (although note that this requires users to request that a site is enabled for OAuth integrations).
Mitigating Malicious Downloads Through Defence In Depth
In the other common attack method where a user downloads a malicious file through a link or attachment, files can be directly exploitable (like an executable), or they might be files that allow execution, such as Microsoft Office macros.
Attackers also use layers of different files to sneak past other controls, perhaps encrypting a zip file, or using a file users aren’t familiar with, like a .iso disk image.
It’s harder to prevent successful attacks from files like this, but it is possible. Organisations have the power to put in place technical measures that reduce the responsibility on a user. By implementing the enterprise-level actions below, it’s possible to greatly reduce the chance of successful attacks on your network.
Let’s break the measures down into three stages.
1. Preventing delivery of the phishing email:
-
- use email scanning and web proxies to help remove some threats before they arrive
- DMARC and SPF policies can significantly reduce delivery of spoofed emails to users
2. Preventing execution of initial code:
-
- put in place allow-listing to make sure that executables can’t run from any directory to which a user can write – this will prevent a significant number of attacks
- for anything not covered in allow-listing, use registry settings to ensure that dangerous scripting or file types are opened in Notepad and not executed – for PowerShell, you can minimise risk by using PowerShell constrained mode and script signing
- disable the mounting of .iso files on user endpoints
- make sure that macro settings are locked down (see the NCSC’s guidance on macro security) and that only users who absolutely need them – and are trained on the risks they present – can use them
- enable attack surface reduction rules
- ensure you update third-party software, such as PDF readers, or even better, use a browser to open such files
- keep up to date with current threats with wider reading about any new attack vectors emerging
3. Preventing further harm:
-
- allow-listing is again a powerful way to prevent further harm once a malicious file is opened
- DNS filtering tools, such as PDNS (for UK public sector and also the private sector) can block suspicious connections and prevent many early-stage attacks
- organisations can also carry out endpoint detection and response (EDR) and monitoring to look for suspicious behaviour on hosts
Does This Mean We Can Stop Training People To Recognise Suspicious Links?
Let’s be clear that if your organisation implements the measures above, and tests and maintains them, it’s likely there will be a significant drop in attackers exploiting your users to gain initial access. But it’s still worth training users to spot suspicious links. Why is this?
- Firstly, because one of the above controls may fail, and so defence in depth is always good.
- Secondly, a determined attacker who is very focused on finding a route into a particular company network may also target users’ personal accounts to get to their end objective. So it’s ideal if users can also spot suspicious emails in their personal accounts, where organisational protections aren’t in place. (This has the added benefit that it also helps protect them against phishing that seeks to steal money or otherwise extort them.)
- And finally, if users can spot suspicious emails and have the mechanisms to report them, it can be a really useful source of intelligence for organisations, throwing light on compromise attempts that otherwise might be missed. This is particularly true for organisations facing greater threats.
Building A Strong Reporting Culture
It’s time for organisations to move away from using blame and fear around clicking links, even if it’s usually unintentional. This means, for example, not running phishing exercises that chastise users for clicking on bad links.
Imagine a scenario where a user isn’t embarrassed to report when they’ve clicked on a malicious link, so they do so promptly, the security team thanks them for their swift action, and then works quickly to understand the resulting exposure. This is a much more constructive sequence of events, and with the added security benefit that an attack is identified early on.
We should also make it easy for users to report suspicious emails, such as using email add-ins widely.
Usability And Security Can Go Together
This article is a call to encourage organisations to think about the question from a different perspective. We know that telling users not to click on bad links just isn’t working, so let’s suspend belief for a second and think about it in a different way. What would we do differently if we were actually encouraging users to click links without fear?
We’re not of course, but the point here is that we don’t have to choose between usability and security. Bringing the two together can achieve the right level of security, while also allowing people to get on with their jobs, and without blaming them when things go wrong.
-/ 30 /-
What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment below!
More ScamsNOW.com Articles
-/ 30 /-
What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment above!
SCARS LINKS: AgainstScams.org RomanceScamsNOW.com ContraEstafas.org ScammerPhotos.com Anyscam.com ScamsNOW.com
reporting.AgainstScams.org support.AgainstScams.org membership.AgainstScams.org donate.AgainstScams.org shop.AgainstScams.org
youtube.AgainstScams.org linkedin.AgainstScams.org facebook.AgainstScams.org
ARTICLE RATING
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CATEGORIES
MOST POPULAR COMMENTED ARTICLES
POPULAR ARTICLES
U.S. & Canada Suicide Lifeline 988
![NavyLogo@4x-81[1]](https://scamsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/NavyLogo@4x-811.png)
ARTICLE META
WHAT PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT LATEST SITE COMMENTS
See Comments for this Article at the Bottom of the Page
on The Uniqueness Of Scam Victims Or Fraud Victims – 2024: “unfortunately all true. It is highly stressful dealing with the aftermath. I am being sued for the money I borrowed…” Jul 6, 12:50
on Scam Victims & Mental Health Blaming – 2023 [UPDATED 2025]: “For most of my life words have defeated me, made me feel insignificant, unwanted, unneeded. For this reason it is…” Jul 5, 13:36
on Substance Abuse Susceptibility And Scam Victims – 2024: “It is understandable how some would feel that alcohol or substance abuse would be helpful in handling their feelings after…” Jul 1, 20:36
on Scam Victims Use Work To Avoid Healing: “The last 6 years have been the most difficult of my life. The pandemic, having both parents in the hospital…” Jun 29, 18:38
on Entitlement Mentality And How Scam Victims Often Lose Their Path To Recovery – 2024: “Thank you for this discussion of entitlement. I can see from the descriptions listed that I have not felt entitlement.…” Jun 29, 18:22
on Samurai Wisdom and Rituals for Clearing the Mind After Scam Trauma – 2025 – [VIDEOS]: “A great guide on how to move forward in our recovery process with a calm mind, cleansed on an ongoing…” Jun 28, 07:34
on Delayed Gratification and Patience in Scam Victim Recovery – 2025 – [VIDEOS]: “We want to recover quickly and… we make new mistakes. How not to speed up the recovery process, how to…” Jun 28, 06:41
on The Unique Injury Of Betrayal Trauma On Scam Victims – 2024: “Primarily because you did not see it coming” Jun 27, 23:57
on Changes In A Scam Victim’s Life: “I really detest the way my trust in others has been affected by the scamming I went through. I used…” Jun 27, 14:47
on The Unique Injury Of Betrayal Trauma On Scam Victims – 2024: “Betrayal Trauma is the worst feeling ever. Why does it seem so much worse when a scammer does that to…” Jun 27, 14:34
on EMDR Therapy For Scam Victims’ Trauma – A Part Of The Recovery Process For Many – 2024: “Very comprehensive article explaining all aspects of EMDR. I’d only heard of it before and now I have a much…” Jun 26, 19:01
on Forgiving Yourself After Surviving a Romance or Investment Scam – 2025: “Thank you for this valuable article. Self-forgiveness was for me the biggest step that led to my recovery. That also…” Jun 26, 17:28
on Counseling And Your Native Language: “These points make perfect sense. I can’t imagine trying to express complex emotions in a second language. I realize many…” Jun 26, 16:05
on Thought-Terminating Cliches – How What You and Others Say Stops Critical Thinking and Recovery for Scam Victims – 2025: “I didn’t realize that these “innocent phrases” clichés ending thoughts, can have such effect / negative -inhibiting / on our…” Jun 26, 14:48
on Scam Victim Resistance In Support Groups Therapy Or Counseling Can Destroy Opportunities For Recovery – 2024: “Working with either a support group or therapist to me means a self commitment to actively participating in the therapy.…” Jun 24, 21:01
on ‘I Just Want To Forget It’ – Denial & Avoidance Are Natural But Will Not Help Scam Victims On Their Path To Recovery From Scams – 2024: “My financial loss, the shock and betrayal of the crime ending all combined to fray my nerves and spend hours…” Jun 24, 20:10
on You Hate Being Told What To Do? How Your Rebellious Mentality Can Sabotage Your Recovery – 2025: “I am a bit of a rebel, and the moment someone tells me to do something, worse, does it even…” Jun 24, 15:04
on You Hate Being Told What To Do? How Your Rebellious Mentality Can Sabotage Your Recovery – 2025: “You are very welcome” Jun 24, 03:01
on You Hate Being Told What To Do? How Your Rebellious Mentality Can Sabotage Your Recovery – 2025: “This is a great article, which makes perfect sense as to why anyone would resist the help offered to them.…” Jun 23, 20:01
Important Information for New Scam Victims
Please visit www.ScamVictimsSupport.org – a SCARS Website for New Scam Victims & Sextortion Victims
SCARS Institute now offers a free recovery program at www.SCARSeducation.org
Please visit www.ScamPsychology.org – to more fully understand the psychological concepts involved in scams and scam victim recovery
If you are looking for local trauma counselors, please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org
If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines
Statement About Victim Blaming
Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and not to blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and help victims avoid scams in the future. At times, this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims; we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.
These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens, and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.
Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org
SCARS INSTITUTE RESOURCES:
If You Have Been Victimized By A Scam Or Cybercrime
♦ If you are a victim of scams, go to www.ScamVictimsSupport.org for real knowledge and help
♦ Enroll in SCARS Scam Survivor’s School now at www.SCARSeducation.org
♦ To report criminals, visit https://reporting.AgainstScams.org – we will NEVER give your data to money recovery companies like some do!
♦ Follow us and find our podcasts, webinars, and helpful videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RomancescamsNowcom
♦ Learn about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org
♦ Dig deeper into the reality of scams, fraud, and cybercrime at www.ScamsNOW.com and www.RomanceScamsNOW.com
♦ Scam Survivor’s Stories: www.ScamSurvivorStories.org
♦ For Scam Victim Advocates visit www.ScamVictimsAdvocates.org
♦ See more scammer photos on www.ScammerPhotos.com
You can also find the SCARS Institute on Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, and TruthSocial
Psychology Disclaimer:
All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only
The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.
Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.
While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.
Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.
If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.
Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here
If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair, please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.
More ScamsNOW.com Articles
A Question of Trust
At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish. Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors’ experience. You can do Google searches, but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.