CDA Section 230 Groundbreaking Decision in California Civil Case
Has the Dam Finally Broken or is it just a Leak?
• SCARS Editorial Team – Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
NOTE: This article about the Communications Decency Act CDA Section 230 is not intended to be a legal opinion. SCARS is not a law firm nor are licensed attorneys. This is an analysis of this case based on the need to understand the implications for potential future cases and rulings. SCARS has long suggested that social media applications could be considered defective and dangerous products, and we are gratified to see this concept finally emerge in this case.
In the Case of Neville v. Snap – Applying the Communications Decency Act CDA Section 230 in Groundbreaking Decision in California Civil Case
Judge Rejects Snap’s Section 230 Defense in Neville v. Snap
Has Read More …