The True Name of Things

About This Article

Accurate names, words, and language can help traumatized scam victims restore reality after deception blurred the meanings of relationships, money, trust, secrecy, emergencies, and identity. A scammer’s real legal name can remain unknown while the offender can still be accurately understood as a criminal, fraudster, manipulator, impersonator, or other appropriate description. Naming emotional experiences also separates grief, shame, guilt, attachment, fear, self-blame, and trauma into distinguishable processes that can be examined individually. Precise language helps a victim move from being consumed by an experience toward observing and understanding it. It also restores boundaries between affection and manipulation, loyalty and compliance, fact and fantasy, and responsibility and shame. Clear language does not erase pain, but it can make the experience more understandable and manageable.

Note: This article is intended for informational purposes and does not replace professional medical advice. If you are experiencing distress, please consult a qualified mental health professional.

Keywords

Names, Word, Language, Accurate Naming, Scam Trauma, Language, Manipulation, Fraud, Emotional Clarity, False Identity, Psychological Distance, Self-Blame, Reality Restoration

Understanding the Importance of Knowledge

Author’s Note

Names, words, and language played a central role in creating the deceptive reality of a scam. Criminals rename manipulation as love, financial exploitation as help, secrecy as protection, and compliance as trust. Healing requires reversing that distortion by returning accurate names to people, events, emotions, and consequences. A victim does not need to discover every hidden fact about the offender before understanding what happened. Learning the real names of the crime and its psychological effects can restore clarity, boundaries, and the ability to observe the experience without allowing the offender’s language to continue defining reality.

Prof. Emeritus Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.
August, 2026

Knowing the Real Names of Things: Language, Reality, and Power After Scam Trauma

Human beings have always understood that names do more than identify things. A name separates one thing from another, gives form to something previously indistinct, and allows the mind to hold an idea still long enough to examine it. This understanding appears throughout mythology, folklore, religion, philosophy, and ordinary human speech. Something unknown can feel mysterious, threatening, or uncontrollable, while something accurately named becomes more comprehensible. The ancient idea that knowing the true name of something gives a person power over it expresses a deeper human truth: understanding begins when reality receives the correct name.

The story of Rumpelstiltskin preserves this idea in a particularly useful form. His power depends partly upon concealment. He controls the situation while his identity remains unknown, and discovering his true name breaks that control. The story does not need to function as a literal belief in magical names to retain its meaning. Its deeper insight concerns the relationship between mystery and power. Something hidden can control imagination because the person confronting it cannot fully define what it is. Naming removes part of that mystery and gives the observer a new position in relation to it.

This idea has unusual importance for traumatized scam victims because fraud depends upon false names. A sophisticated scam does not merely involve a person lying about an identity. The deception creates an entire false world in which names become detached from reality. A criminal calls manipulation love. Financial exploitation becomes help. Compliance becomes trust. Isolation becomes privacy. Pressure becomes urgency. A fabricated emergency becomes a crisis. Theft becomes an investment. Repeated demands become temporary problems. Resistance becomes disloyalty. The criminal constructs a reality by controlling what things are called.

The fictional identity itself represents the deepest false name. A victim can know the supposed name of a person, hear stories about childhood, learn details about work, family, friends, dreams, fears, illnesses, previous relationships, favorite foods, daily routines, and future plans. The victim can accumulate thousands of messages and years of memories connected to that person while knowing almost nothing about the actual offender. The name can be false. The photographs can belong to someone else. The occupation can be invented. The location can be fictional. Several criminals can participate in maintaining one identity.

This creates a peculiar darkness at the center of scam victimization. A victim has shared a real life with someone who remained hidden. The criminal can know the victim’s real name, real family, real vulnerabilities, real finances, real fears, and real hopes while the victim possesses an elaborate biography of someone who never existed as represented. The offender knows the person. The person knows the mask.

That imbalance can continue long after discovery because the mind naturally wants to know who was behind the mask. A victim can search photographs, telephone numbers, social media accounts, addresses, names, email records, financial transactions, and fragments of information in an attempt to answer the seemingly fundamental question: Who was this person really?

The question makes sense, but it can also become a trap. The offender’s legal identity can remain unknown forever. International fraud networks, stolen photographs, false accounts, disposable telephone numbers, aliases, money mules, organized criminal teams, and multiple operators can make definitive identification impossible. If psychological resolution depends upon learning the birth name of the criminal, the criminal can retain power simply by remaining unknown.

The ancient idea of the true name offers another way to understand the problem. A person does not need the offender’s legal name to discover the real name of what the offender was.

The person who presented himself as a lover can be named a criminal. The trusted confidant can be named a manipulator. The investment adviser can be named a fraudster. The person who threatened exposure can be named an extortionist. The person who deliberately created a false identity can be named an impersonator. These names do not reveal everything about the person behind the mask, but they identify something more important for healing: what that person actually did.

The difference matters because naming reorganizes reality. Calling someone a criminal instead of a lost lover does not merely change vocabulary. It changes the category into which the mind places that individual. Human beings respond differently to criminals than to intimate partners. They establish different boundaries, interpret memories differently, assign responsibility differently, and understand continued contact differently.

A scam victim does not need to know whether “David” or “Jessica” was really David or Jessica before understanding that the person using that identity committed fraud. The real biography can remain hidden while the true nature of the relationship becomes increasingly clear. Mystery about the offender does not have to remain mystery about the crime.

The same process applies to everything surrounding the experience. Trauma creates confusion partly because many separate experiences collapse into one overwhelming emotional mass. A victim can simultaneously experience grief, attachment, shame, guilt, humiliation, anger, loneliness, fear, financial distress, regret, self-blame, distrust, and the loss of an imagined future. Without language that distinguishes them, all of those experiences can become one enormous feeling described simply as terrible, unbearable, or confusing.

Naming Begins Separating the Mass Into Parts

Grief is not shame. Shame is not guilt. Guilt is not responsibility. Attachment is not proof that the fraudulent persona was real. Longing is not evidence that renewed contact would be healthy. Fear is not always evidence of present danger. Regret is not the same as culpability. Financial grief differs from romantic grief. The loss of confidence in judgment differs from loss of intelligence.

Each distinction gives the mind something more precise to work with.

A person who says, “I am stupid,” has named the self as the problem. A person who recognizes, “I am experiencing shame because I was deceived,” has identified an emotional response. The first statement creates a verdict. The second creates something that can be observed.

A person who says, “I ruined my life,” turns many consequences into a total judgment of identity. A person who identifies financial loss, damaged trust, grief, disrupted relationships, and diminished confidence has transformed an overwhelming condemnation into several identifiable problems. Those problems can require difficult work, but they can be examined separately.

This is where naming becomes more than description. Accurate naming creates psychological distance between the observer and the experience.

When something has no name, a person can exist completely inside it. Shame feels like truth. Fear feels like reality. Attachment feels like destiny. Confusion feels like personal incapacity. Once a person can recognize, “This is shame,” another position becomes possible. Shame remains present, but the person can observe it rather than accepting it automatically as a definition of the self.

The same change occurs when grief receives its name. Grief becomes something that can be mourned rather than evidence that the fraudulent relationship should resume. Attachment becomes something that can be understood rather than a command to reconnect. Self-blame becomes a pattern of thought that can be examined rather than an unquestioned statement of fact.

The person gradually moves from being consumed by an experience to observing an experience occurring within them. That difference creates room for understanding, and understanding creates room for choice.

This makes language particularly significant after scams because language helped create the original captivity. A scammer manipulated not only information but meaning. The criminal repeatedly defined events in ways that served the fraud. Money became proof of love. Skepticism became betrayal. Verification became distrust. Secrecy became loyalty. Pressure became necessity. Compliance became commitment.

The offender did not need to control every thought if the offender could control the names attached to important events.

A victim can continue carrying those names long after discovering the crime. References to “our relationship,” “our future,” “his emergency,” “helping her,” or “their investment” can preserve parts of the reality created by the criminal. These phrases can continue giving fraudulent constructs the dignity of legitimate things.

Healing Requires Language to Return to Reality

The relationship can become a fraudulent relationship built through deception. The shared future can become an imagined future created within the manipulation. The emergency can become a fabricated crisis. The financial assistance can become money obtained through fraud. The secrecy can become isolation. The romantic identity can become a persona. The person behind that persona can become the offender.

This change should not become an exercise in replacing painful words with reassuring ones. That would simply create another distortion. Scam victims do not need euphemisms. They need accuracy.

Betrayal should remain betrayal. Theft should remain theft. Financial destruction should not become a blessing merely because positive language sounds comforting. Grief should remain grief. The purpose of finding the real names of things is not to make reality pleasant. It is to make reality clear.

Accurate language also allows apparently contradictory truths to coexist. A victim can have experienced genuine attachment to a fraudulent persona. A person can have made decisions they regret while another person remains responsible for deliberately engineering the deception. A victim can miss the imagined person while recognizing that the person never existed as represented. Someone can feel love while understanding that returning to the offender would be dangerous.

Precise language makes these distinctions possible because it prevents one emotion from defining the entire reality.

Knowing the real names of things also restores boundaries that deception destroyed. Fraud depends upon collapsing categories that should remain separate. Manipulation becomes confused with affection. Compliance becomes confused with loyalty. Fantasy becomes confused with fact. Criminal conduct becomes confused with relationship conflict. Pressure becomes confused with obligation.

Naming Restores the Boundaries Between these Things

A criminal does not receive the privileges of an intimate partner simply because the criminal once occupied that role in the victim’s mind. A fabricated emergency does not deserve the response required by a real emergency. An intrusive memory does not establish that the offender should be contacted. Attachment does not establish authenticity. Shame does not establish guilt.

Once the thing receives its proper name, the mind can begin applying the appropriate response.

This principle extends beyond scam victimization because language gives human beings a fundamental tool for organizing internal reality. Unknown or poorly defined experiences remain difficult to manage because they have no clear boundaries. The person experiences them without understanding where one ends and another begins. Naming divides experience into recognizable parts and allows consciousness to examine those parts.

This explains why learning the language of trauma can matter so much during recovery. Terms such as manipulation, grooming, betrayal, attachment, grief, shame, self-blame, coercion, fantasy, trauma activation, and identity disruption do more than expand vocabulary. They give structure to experiences that previously felt shapeless.

A victim begins by experiencing something.

The person eventually learns what it is called.

• Once it has a name, the person can observe it.
• Once it can be observed, it can be studied and understood.
• Once it can be understood, the person gains greater ability to decide what to do about it.

The power does not come from the word alone. The power comes from the clarity the word makes possible.

This returns the idea to Rumpelstiltskin. The hidden figure loses power when the mystery surrounding him ends. For a scam victim, the person behind the false identity can remain mysterious, but the experience itself does not have to remain mysterious. The legal name of the criminal can remain unknown while the criminal behavior becomes accurately named. The true face can remain undiscovered while manipulation becomes recognizable. The real biography can remain hidden while the fraudulent relationship receives an honest description.

The most important question can gradually change from “Who was this person really?” to “What was this really?” That second question has answers.

It was deception. It was manipulation. It was exploitation. It was a crime. The attachment was real even though the persona was false. The grief is real even though the promised future never existed outside the deception. Shame is an emotional response rather than a verdict. Confusion reflects the experience of having reality deliberately manipulated rather than proof of stupidity or weakness.

These names return order to what deception confused.

The scammer originally possessed the power to name things. The criminal decided what the relationship would be called, what the money represented, what secrecy meant, what trust required, and what resistance supposedly revealed about the victim. The scam succeeded partly because those names influenced how reality was understood.

Recovery Reverses that Authority

A victim begins naming reality instead of continuing to inhabit the language created by the offender. The criminal becomes a criminal. The persona becomes a persona. The manipulation becomes manipulation. The crime becomes a crime. The grief becomes grief. The shame becomes shame. The attachment becomes attachment. The loss becomes loss.

None of those names instantly removes pain. They accomplish something more fundamental first. They make the pain intelligible.

What becomes intelligible can become observable. What becomes observable can become understandable. What becomes understandable can increasingly become manageable.

The true name of the scammer might remain unknown forever. That fact does not have to leave a permanent darkness at the center of the experience. A victim can know the true names of what happened, what the criminal did, what was lost, what emotions remain, and what processes now require healing.

The ancient stories understood that mystery can magnify power. Modern scam victimization demonstrates the same truth in another form. Fraud thrives by disguising reality and replacing accurate names with useful lies.

Healing begins to reverse that deception when language returns things to their proper places.

Knowing the real names of things does not create magical power over the past. It creates something more practical and enduring. It gives a person the ability to observe reality more accurately, understand what is happening within them, distinguish one problem from another, and choose how to respond.

For a traumatized scam victim, that is a genuine form of reclaimed power.

Conclusion

Knowing the real names of things restores order where deception created confusion. A scammer can hide behind an alias, stolen photographs, invented history, and a fabricated persona, but anonymity does not prevent a victim from accurately identifying what occurred. Fraud can be named fraud. Manipulation can be named manipulation. Exploitation can be named exploitation. Grief, attachment, shame, fear, self-blame, betrayal, and trauma can each receive their proper names. Once these experiences become distinguishable, they no longer have to exist as one overwhelming and undefined mass.

Accurate language also restores boundaries that deception deliberately blurred. A criminal no longer needs to occupy the psychological category of an intimate partner. A fabricated emergency no longer deserves the response given to a genuine crisis. Attachment does not establish authenticity, shame does not prove guilt, and grief does not require renewed contact. Naming allows a victim to separate what happened from what the offender claimed was happening.

The offender’s legal identity can remain unknown without leaving the entire experience unknowable. A victim can understand the crime, identify its effects, recognize the emotional processes that remain, and develop appropriate responses without ever learning who actually stood behind the false identity. The power of naming does not come from magic. It comes from clarity. When language returns things to their proper places, reality becomes easier to observe, understand, and manage. That clarity restores something deception attempted to take away: the authority to define what happened and decide what comes next.

Glossary

• Accurate Language — Accurate language uses words that describe people, events, emotions, and behaviors according to what they actually represent rather than how a scammer portrayed them. Accurate terminology helps a scam victim distinguish criminal exploitation from love, fabricated emergencies from genuine crises, and emotional responses from personal defects. This clarity supports better judgment because the person can respond to reality rather than continue responding to the meanings created during the deception. — Reality Testing
• Alias — An alias is a false or substitute name that a scammer uses to conceal actual identity and create a believable persona. A victim can become deeply attached to the identity associated with an alias while never learning the legal name of the person behind it. Understanding the function of an alias helps separate the emotional significance of the fictional identity from the criminal who deliberately used it. — Identity Deception
• Category Boundary — A category boundary separates one type of person, behavior, experience, or relationship from another so that each receives an appropriate interpretation and response. Scam manipulation can weaken these boundaries by making criminal conduct resemble affection, financial exploitation resemble assistance, or pressure resemble obligation. Restoring category boundaries helps a victim recognize that attachment does not establish authenticity and that a criminal does not receive the privileges of an intimate partner. — Reality Testing
• Category Collapse — Category collapse occurs when deception causes normally distinct concepts to become confused with one another. A scammer can make manipulation resemble affection, compliance resemble loyalty, fantasy resemble fact, and financial exploitation resemble relationship responsibility. Recognizing category collapse helps a victim separate these concepts again and respond according to what actually occurred rather than the meanings imposed during the scam. — Scam Tactics
• Criminal Naming — Criminal naming is the practice of identifying an offender according to demonstrated conduct rather than continuing to define that person primarily through a fraudulent relationship role. Calling an offender a criminal, fraudster, manipulator, impersonator, or extortionist can place the person into a more accurate category. This change can help a victim establish boundaries and interpret past interactions according to the criminal behavior that occurred. — Reality Testing
• Deceptive Naming — Deceptive naming occurs when a scammer assigns reassuring, romantic, urgent, or respectable language to actions that serve fraud and exploitation. Financial demands can become help, isolation can become privacy, pressure can become urgency, and compliance can become proof of trust. Recognizing deceptive naming helps a victim understand how language influenced interpretation and supported the false reality of the scam. — Emotional Manipulation
• Emotional Differentiation — Emotional differentiation is the process of separating a complicated emotional experience into identifiable feelings and psychological processes. A victim can distinguish grief from shame, guilt from responsibility, attachment from authenticity, and fear from evidence of immediate danger. Greater differentiation gives the person more precise problems to understand and address instead of treating all distress as one overwhelming condition. — Emotional Regulation
• Emotional Mass — Emotional mass describes the overwhelming combination of grief, attachment, shame, guilt, humiliation, anger, loneliness, fear, regret, distrust, self-blame, and financial distress that can follow scam discovery. These experiences can become difficult to distinguish when a victim lacks language for separating them. Naming individual components reduces the sense that everything is one incomprehensible problem and allows each part to receive a more appropriate response. — Trauma Response
• Fabricated Crisis — A fabricated crisis is an invented or deliberately distorted emergency that a scammer presents as genuine in order to create urgency, emotional pressure, or financial compliance. A victim can respond to the event as though a real person faces immediate danger because the deception gives the situation the language of emergency. Naming it as fabricated helps restore the distinction between genuine need and criminal manipulation. — Scam Tactics
• False Identity — A false identity is the invented personal representation that a scammer uses to establish credibility, emotional connection, authority, trust, or intimacy. It can include a false name, photographs, occupation, family history, location, personal experiences, and future plans. Recognizing the identity as constructed helps a victim separate attachment to the presented character from knowledge about the actual offender. — Identity Deception
• False Name — A false name is the identity label a scammer uses to conceal who actually stands behind the communication. The name can become emotionally significant because a victim associates it with conversations, promises, memories, affection, and imagined experiences. Recognizing the name as part of the deception helps prevent the fictional identity from retaining authority simply because the offender’s true legal name remains unknown. — Identity Deception
• False World — A false world is the constructed reality created when a scammer combines invented identity, fabricated events, manipulated meanings, false relationships, and deceptive explanations into a coherent experience. A victim can make genuine emotional and financial decisions inside that world because the available information appears real at the time. Recognizing the false world helps separate authentic human responses from the fraudulent environment designed to produce them. — Belief Distortion
• Fraudulent Construct — A fraudulent construct is a person, relationship, event, opportunity, emergency, or future that acquires apparent reality through deliberate deception. Scam victims can continue referring to these constructs with the language originally supplied by the offender even after discovering the fraud. Renaming them according to their actual function helps remove legitimacy from ideas that existed primarily to sustain manipulation. — Scam Tactics
• Fraudulent Relationship — A fraudulent relationship is an apparent emotional or interpersonal bond deliberately built through false identity, deceptive intentions, and manipulated information. A victim’s feelings and attachment can remain genuine even though the offender entered or maintained the relationship for fraudulent purposes. Naming the relationship accurately allows the person to respect the reality of personal emotions without granting authenticity to the offender’s representation. — Relationship Fraud
• Identity Concealment — Identity concealment is the deliberate hiding of an offender’s actual name, location, appearance, biography, associates, or role in a criminal operation. Scam networks can use stolen photographs, aliases, disposable accounts, false documents, and multiple operators to preserve this concealment. Understanding identity concealment helps a victim recognize that failure to discover the offender’s legal identity does not prevent accurate understanding of the crime. — Scam Tactics
• Identity Mask — An identity mask is the fictional character through which a scammer interacts with a victim while concealing the person or criminal group responsible for the deception. The mask can contain detailed personal history, photographs, habits, emotional expressions, and future plans that make it appear complete and human. Recognizing the mask as a constructed identity helps separate remembered intimacy from factual knowledge about the offender. — Identity Deception
• Identity Mystery — Identity mystery is the unresolved uncertainty surrounding the actual person or people responsible for maintaining a fraudulent persona. A victim can spend significant emotional energy searching for the real name, face, location, or biography behind the deception. Recognizing that the crime can become understandable even when the offender remains unidentified prevents unresolved identity questions from controlling the entire healing process. — Recovery Barrier
• Language Captivity — Language captivity occurs when a victim continues interpreting the scam through terms and meanings originally supplied by the offender. Phrases such as shared future, relationship problem, emergency, investment, or proof of love can preserve elements of the fraudulent reality after discovery. Replacing those meanings with accurate descriptions helps reduce the continued psychological influence of the scammer’s narrative. — Emotional Manipulation
• Language Control — Language control is the scammer’s ability to influence how a victim interprets events by controlling the words attached to them. A criminal can define skepticism as betrayal, secrecy as loyalty, financial compliance as commitment, and verification as distrust. Recognizing this control helps a victim see that manipulation involved not only false facts but also deliberate management of meaning. — Scam Tactics
• Meaning Manipulation — Meaning manipulation occurs when a scammer changes the apparent significance of an action or event so that behavior serving the fraud appears legitimate, loving, necessary, or morally required. The criminal does not need to control every thought if the person can control how important events are interpreted. Identifying meaning manipulation helps a victim reconsider past decisions within the actual circumstances of deception rather than the meanings created by the offender. — Emotional Manipulation
• Naming Authority — Naming authority is the ability to define people, events, behaviors, and experiences according to reality rather than accepting definitions imposed by another person. During a scam, the offender can hold substantial naming authority by deciding what trust, love, secrecy, urgency, commitment, and financial assistance supposedly mean. A victim begins reclaiming that authority by applying accurate language to the crime and its emotional consequences. — Recovery Process
• Naming Distinction — Naming distinction is the use of precise language to separate experiences that can feel similar while carrying different meanings and requiring different responses. A victim can distinguish longing from a reason to reconnect, shame from proof of guilt, and attachment from evidence that the persona was authentic. These distinctions make emotional and cognitive experiences easier to examine without allowing one feeling to define the entire situation. — Recovery Insight
• Naming Reorganization — Naming reorganization occurs when accurate terminology changes how the mind categorizes and interprets a person, event, or emotional experience. Calling a supposed lover a criminal or a supposed investment a fraud changes more than vocabulary because it places the experience into a different framework. This reorganization can influence boundaries, responsibility, memory interpretation, and decisions about continued contact. — Reality Testing
• Offender Anonymity — Offender anonymity is the condition in which the actual person or criminal group responsible for a scam remains unidentified despite the victim knowing extensive details about the fraudulent persona. This uncertainty can encourage prolonged searching because the mind naturally seeks completion and explanation. A victim can reduce the psychological importance of anonymity by accurately identifying the offender’s conduct even when legal identity remains unknown. — Recovery Barrier
• Observer Position — Observer position is the psychological stance that develops when a person can recognize an emotion or thought as something occurring within consciousness rather than as a complete definition of reality or identity. Naming shame, grief, attachment, or self-blame can help create this separation. A victim who develops an observer position gains greater opportunity to examine the experience and choose a response instead of reacting automatically from within it. — Emotional Regulation
• Persona — A persona is the constructed character that a scammer presents as a real person during a fraudulent relationship or communication. The persona can contain a name, photographs, occupation, personality, history, family, emotions, routines, and future ambitions designed to create credibility and attachment. Recognizing the persona as a construction allows a victim to distinguish genuine emotional experience from the fictional identity used to produce it. — Identity Deception
• Precise Language — Precise language describes experiences with enough specificity to prevent one broad judgment or emotion from absorbing several different problems. A victim who identifies financial loss, disrupted relationships, grief, damaged trust, and reduced confidence gains more useful information than someone who concludes simply that life has been ruined. Precision supports problem solving because each identified difficulty can receive separate attention. — Recovery Practice
• Psychological Distance — Psychological distance is the separation that develops when a person can observe an emotion, belief, memory, or reaction without automatically treating it as unquestionable truth. Accurate naming can help create this distance by turning an undefined internal experience into something recognizable. A victim can experience shame while also recognizing that shame is an emotional response rather than a factual judgment about personal worth. — Emotional Regulation
• Reality Clarification — Reality clarification is the process of replacing fraudulent meanings, ambiguous interpretations, and global self-judgments with descriptions that match what actually occurred. It allows a victim to distinguish the offender’s claims from the criminal behavior, personal emotions from objective evidence, and imagined futures from events that truly existed. Greater clarity provides a more stable basis for decisions, boundaries, and continued healing. — Reality Testing
• Restored Boundaries — Restored boundaries are the conceptual and practical separations rebuilt after fraud blurred distinctions between intimacy and exploitation, loyalty and compliance, fact and fantasy, or obligation and pressure. Accurate naming helps a victim recognize which category a person or experience actually belongs within. These restored boundaries support safety because a criminal no longer receives access, trust, or emotional privileges based on a fraudulent former role. — Victim Safety
• True Name — A true name is the accurate description of what a person, event, behavior, relationship, or emotional experience actually represents rather than the label created through deception. The true name of an offender does not have to be a legal birth name because criminal conduct can provide the more important practical identification. For a scam victim, finding true names restores clarity by replacing mystery and manipulated meanings with language grounded in reality. — Recovery Insight
• Unknown Offender — An unknown offender is the actual person or criminal participant whose legal identity remains concealed behind a false name, stolen image, fabricated biography, or coordinated scam operation. A victim can know extensive details about the fictional character while knowing almost nothing verifiable about this individual. Accepting that the offender can remain unknown while the crime becomes fully recognized prevents identity uncertainty from blocking understanding and healing. — Identity Deception

Author Biographies

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment below!