Conformity and Peer Pressure in Scam Recovery Groups

Avoiding and Navigating Conformity and Peer Pressure in Scam Recovery Groups and Communities that can Interfere with Scam Victims’ Recovery

Primary Category: Scam Victim Recovery Psychology

Author:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D., DFin, MCPO, MAnth – Anthropologist, Scientist, Polymath, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

Scam victims often face intense conformity pressure from support groups, friends, and family during recovery. While connection is essential after betrayal, unspoken group norms, peer pressure, and invalidating advice can undermine authentic healing. Victims may silence doubts, suppress emotions, or adopt rigid group beliefs to maintain acceptance, delaying their emotional progress and damaging self-trust. These patterns appear in both supportive environments and toxic spaces, including groups that promote hostility, toxic positivity, or unrealistic recovery timelines. Authentic recovery requires balancing connection with personal boundaries, embracing emotional complexity, and maintaining space for dissent and individual growth. Facilitators and support leaders play a critical role in creating psychologically safe environments that encourage honest dialogue, diverse experiences, and emotional integrity. Scam victims protect their progress by recognizing conformity pressure, setting boundaries, diversifying support, and prioritizing self-trust throughout every stage of healing.

Note: This article is intended for informational purposes and does not replace professional medical advice. If you are experiencing distress, please consult a qualified mental health professional.

Avoiding and Navigating Conformity and Peer Pressure in Scam Recovery Groups and Communities that can Interfere with Scam Victims’ Recovery

Author’s Note

This content was created for a broad audience, including scam victims and survivors, their families, support professionals, and advocates. Typically, when addressing scam survivors directly, we use second-person language to speak to you personally. In this case, we chose a third-person approach to ensure the information applies clearly to all readers.

Introduction to Conformity and Peer Pressure in Scam Recovery Groups

Scam victims often face an overwhelming need to belong after betrayal, and this leads to unintentional conformity. The loss of trust, identity, and emotional stability that follows a scam leaves most people isolated and unsure of themselves. In this vulnerable state, the desire to reconnect with others becomes intense. Victims join support groups, talk to friends and family, or search for online spaces where they feel understood. These connections can help with recovery, but they also create hidden risks. One of the most common risks is conformity pressure.

Conformity is the influence that groups, families, and communities exert on individuals to align their behavior, beliefs, or emotions with group expectations. In scam recovery, this pressure often appears subtly. Victims may feel obligated to adopt certain views, mirror group language, or follow advice without question. They may silence doubts, hide their emotional setbacks, or avoid expressing uncomfortable truths to maintain their place within the group. While this can feel safe in the moment, it creates tension between authentic recovery and group belonging.

Trauma from scams increases a person’s susceptibility to these pressures. Emotional betrayal, cognitive collapse, and identity disruption leave victims unsure of their instincts. Self-blame, shame, and confusion weaken their confidence. In this state, group acceptance feels like a lifeline. Victims may conform to the beliefs or behaviors of those around them, even when those actions contradict their needs or delay their healing. The fear of rejection, judgment, or further isolation keeps many victims silent when they disagree or feel uncomfortable.

This tension between belonging and authenticity is often overlooked in scam recovery spaces. Well-meaning friends, family, or support groups may unintentionally pressure victims to suppress their doubts, adopt group narratives, or conform to specific timelines for healing. Victims who already feel fragile may comply to maintain connection, sacrificing their individuality and delaying meaningful progress. Recognizing how trauma fuels conformity pressure is essential to protecting personal recovery while building supportive relationships. Balancing belonging with self-trust allows scam victims to heal without losing themselves in the process.

Understanding Conformity and Peer Pressure

Conformity is the act of aligning one’s behavior, beliefs, or emotions with the expectations of a group. It can appear as following social norms, adjusting personal opinions, or adopting group-approved actions to avoid standing out. Conformity is a natural part of human social behavior, but in the context of trauma recovery, especially for scam victims, it can become a hidden obstacle to authentic healing.

There are two main types of conformity influence that shape how people behave in groups. The first is normative social influence. This happens when a person conforms to gain acceptance or approval from others. They may not fully agree with the group, but they adjust their behavior to fit in, avoid criticism, or prevent rejection. The second type is informational social influence. In this case, individuals conform because they believe the group holds more accurate information than they do. They assume the group’s beliefs or behaviors are correct, especially in situations where they feel uncertain or inexperienced.

The classic Asch conformity experiments illustrate how powerful these influences can be. In these studies, participants often gave incorrect answers to simple questions because they wanted to match the group’s response, even when they knew the group was wrong. This demonstrates how group pressure can override personal judgment, especially when acceptance feels important or when individuals doubt their own knowledge.

These same dynamics appear in support settings for scam victims. Many victims join support groups, online communities, or peer spaces looking for connection and validation. They want to feel understood and accepted after the isolation of betrayal trauma. In these environments, normative and informational influences can shape their behavior in ways they do not fully recognize.

The desire for acceptance makes victims more likely to mirror group language, adopt shared beliefs, or downplay personal concerns to avoid feeling excluded. They may agree with recovery advice, timelines, or group narratives even when those views feel uncomfortable or inauthentic. Fear of rejection becomes a driving force that silences doubts and reshapes behavior. Instead of expressing unique emotional reactions or questioning the group’s approach, victims conform to maintain belonging.

Informational influence becomes even stronger when trauma weakens self-trust. Scam victims often question their instincts, judgment, and emotional stability after betrayal. They feel lost, ashamed, or unsure of their ability to navigate recovery. In this state, the group appears to hold the answers. Victims may assume the group’s experiences, interpretations, or advice are more valid than their own, leading them to conform even when the group’s guidance does not align with their needs.

Trauma further distorts decision-making, making conformity pressures harder to resist. Cognitive distortions such as black-and-white thinking, self-blame, and catastrophizing lower confidence and increase dependence on external validation. Emotional instability amplifies the need for comfort and safety, which groups seem to provide. As a result, victims become vulnerable to peer pressure that feels like support but delays genuine self-reflection.

Group settings can offer vital connection, but they also carry the risk of conformity undermining recovery. When victims feel unable to express doubts, disagree with dominant opinions, or question group norms, they sacrifice authentic progress. Understanding how normative and informational influence works within trauma-impacted decision-making is essential to helping scam victims balance group support with personal integrity.

Trauma and Vulnerability to Group Influence

Scam victims experience intense psychological disruption after betrayal. The aftermath of a relationship scam, investment fraud, or similar deception leaves most individuals struggling with shame, self-blame, and severe emotional instability. These internal struggles directly increase vulnerability to group influence, making it harder to think independently or challenge harmful dynamics in peer settings.

The Emotional Impact of Scam Trauma

Betrayal trauma reshapes how victims view themselves and the world. Shame becomes one of the most dominant emotional reactions. Scam victims often feel exposed, humiliated, or fundamentally defective because they trusted the wrong person or overlooked manipulation. This shame is not only emotional but also cognitive. Victims begin to believe they are weak, naive, or permanently damaged.

Self-blame intensifies these reactions. Victims frequently replay the scam events, questioning every decision, conversation, or emotional response. They may convince themselves the outcome was their fault or that they should have known better. This pattern becomes reinforced through cognitive distortions such as black-and-white thinking, overgeneralization, and catastrophizing. Many victims believe they have lost all ability to make sound decisions or protect themselves from harm.

This psychological state weakens confidence and increases dependency on others. Emotional instability, combined with fear of further rejection or humiliation, makes victims desperate for external validation. They crave a sense of belonging, understanding, and acceptance that can temporarily quiet the storm of shame and confusion.

Desire for Belonging and Acceptance

The need for belonging after trauma is not a weakness. It reflects the human drive to reconnect, especially after emotional isolation. Scam victims often lose trust in friends, family, or themselves, creating a void that peer groups seem to fill. Support groups, both formal and informal, appear to offer a lifeline. They provide shared experiences, validation, and an immediate sense of community.

However, this longing for acceptance can backfire. Victims may adjust their beliefs, silence their concerns, or imitate group behaviors to avoid rejection. They prioritize fitting in over speaking honestly. Emotional fragility makes disagreement feel dangerous, and many victims believe losing group approval would confirm their unworthiness. In this state, peer influence becomes a powerful force shaping thoughts, emotions, and behavior.

Self-Imposed Pressure and Emotional Fragility

Trauma recovery is filled with uncertainty. Scam victims face overwhelming self-doubt, confusion about identity, and fluctuating emotional states. These factors often lead to self-imposed pressure to appear stable, healed, or accepted by the group. Victims fear showing vulnerability, voicing discomfort, or expressing views that differ from the dominant narrative. They believe doing so might expose their emotional weakness or trigger further shame.

This fragility is compounded by the natural desire to avoid conflict or rejection. Victims may downplay their real emotions, suppress doubts, or adopt group language to maintain their place within the community. Over time, this pattern weakens authentic recovery and replaces individual growth with conformity.

The Rise of Echo Chambers and Toxic Group Dynamics

Unchecked conformity can turn support spaces into echo chambers. When everyone mirrors dominant opinions, reinforces shared frustrations, or praises specific recovery approaches without critical thought, the group loses balance. Diverse perspectives disappear, and new members learn to conform quickly or face subtle rejection.

In some cases, this environment escalates into an echo chamber of hate. Scam victims, fueled by justified anger and hurt, may encourage one another to fixate on revenge, condemnation, or hostility toward others. The group normalizes these emotions without promoting healing or accountability. Members reinforce each other’s bitterness, deepening emotional wounds rather than supporting recovery.

Alternatively, groups may adopt toxic positivity. In this dynamic, discomfort, sadness, or frustration are discouraged. Members pressure each other to focus only on progress, happiness, or gratitude, ignoring the reality of trauma’s complexity. Victims expressing real struggles risk being silenced or judged for “negative” thinking. The group becomes a space for false encouragement that dismisses pain rather than fostering genuine growth.

Both extremes prevent authentic healing. Victims caught in these echo chambers lose the opportunity to explore their emotions honestly, challenge cognitive distortions, or question harmful group patterns. They trade personal growth for group acceptance, often without realizing it.

Understanding how trauma heightens vulnerability to group influence is critical. Scam victims deserve spaces that promote independent thought, emotional safety, and honest dialogue. Without these, conformity pressures, emotional fragility, and peer dynamics can quietly derail recovery and reinforce unhealthy patterns.

Family and Friend Pressures to Conform

Scam victims often face intense pressure to conform from those closest to them. Family members and friends, even with good intentions, frequently respond to the aftermath of a scam with overt advice, minimization, or dismissive language. These patterns can undermine recovery and damage the victim’s ability to rebuild confidence and self-trust.

Overt Advice and Minimization

The most common form of conformity pressure from family and friends comes in the form of unsolicited advice. Loved ones often believe they are helping by offering quick solutions, telling the victim how they should feel, or suggesting simplistic next steps. Phrases like “Just forget about it,” “Stop thinking about the past,” or “Move on with your life” are common. These statements are rarely grounded in malice, but they reflect a deep misunderstanding of trauma’s complexity.

Minimization is another harmful pattern. Friends and family may downplay the impact of the scam, suggesting it was not as serious as the victim believes. Some frame the experience as a temporary setback rather than a profound betrayal with long-lasting emotional consequences. Victims who attempt to share their pain often feel dismissed, ridiculed, or misunderstood. Over time, this invalidation erodes the foundation of honest communication and emotional safety.

The Danger of Invalidation and Self-Trust Erosion

Invalidation from loved ones causes lasting harm. Victims already struggling with shame, self-blame, and confusion become even more doubtful of their emotions and instincts. When family or friends dismiss their feelings, victims begin to question their own experiences. They may silence themselves to maintain peace or suppress their emotions to meet the expectations of others. This damages the ability to establish boundaries, process trauma, or rebuild self-confidence.

Sacrificing self-trust to maintain group belonging within family or friendship circles often prolongs emotional instability. Victims lose the opportunity to explore their authentic reactions, challenge cognitive distortions, or assert their recovery needs. They become trapped between preserving relationships and protecting their mental health.

Negotiated Belonging and the Path to Authenticity

The concept of negotiated belonging offers a healthier alternative. Victims must find a balance between maintaining connection with others and preserving their authenticity. Belonging does not require silence, emotional suppression, or acceptance of harmful advice. It requires clear boundaries, honest communication, and the willingness to tolerate discomfort when others misunderstand or reject the recovery process.

Victims can stay connected to loved ones while protecting their emotional integrity by asserting their needs and refusing to conform to invalidating narratives. This balance fosters genuine relationships that support healing rather than reinforcing harmful conformity patterns.

Peer Pressure in Support Groups and Online Communities

Support groups and online recovery communities provide important emotional outlets for scam victims navigating the aftermath of betrayal trauma. Many victims feel isolated, ashamed, and uncertain about how to process their experiences. When they connect with others who have faced similar deception, it can reduce feelings of loneliness and validate their emotions. However, these same spaces often carry hidden pressures that can undermine personal recovery, especially when group norms become rigid or when peer pressure replaces healthy individual choice.

Group Norms and Emotional Conformity

Every in-person or online recovery space develops its own culture over time. This includes shared language, expected emotional expressions, and unspoken rules that shape how members interact. In well-managed spaces, these norms encourage respect, empathy, and emotional safety. Members feel free to express vulnerability, share setbacks, and explore different stages of healing at their own pace. Unfortunately, not all recovery groups maintain these healthy standards.

In some communities, members feel pressured to conform emotionally or behaviorally to group expectations. This can take several forms. Some groups adopt a culture of toxic positivity, where expressions of grief, anger, or despair are discouraged. Members may feel obligated to appear strong, optimistic, or detached, even when they are struggling internally. This suppresses authentic emotional processing and leaves individuals feeling disconnected from their true experiences.

Other groups lean in the opposite direction, promoting an environment of hostility, blame, or shared resentment. While anger and frustration are valid parts of trauma recovery, groups that encourage aggressive language, constant scapegoating, or an “us versus them” mentality can escalate emotional instability. Victims may feel pressured to adopt this mindset to gain acceptance, even if it contradicts their personal values or recovery needs.

The Risk of Groupthink and Emotional Dependency

One of the most concerning dynamics in rigid support groups is groupthink. Groupthink occurs when individuals suppress doubts, critical questions, or alternative viewpoints to maintain harmony with the majority. In scam recovery spaces, this often means members avoid sharing concerns about group attitudes, disagreeing with aggressive narratives, or questioning harmful coping strategies promoted within the community.

Victims who suppress their individual needs or concerns to align with group norms may experience worsening emotional confusion, delayed boundary setting, or increased dependence on the group for validation. Instead of building personal resilience, they become emotionally dependent on group approval, making it harder to advocate for themselves outside that environment.

Maintaining Space for Dissent and Personal Integrity

Healthy recovery communities must actively encourage space for minority opinions and respectful disagreement. Scam victims should feel safe to express emotions that fall outside group expectations, share different coping experiences, or raise concerns without fear of rejection or ridicule. When members can explore their own pace of healing without conforming to rigid group narratives, they strengthen their emotional independence and self-trust.

At the same time, communities must establish boundaries that protect against hostility, hate, and aggressive behavior. Encouraging dissent is not the same as tolerating emotional abuse, personal attacks, or manipulative language. Moderators and group leaders play a critical role in maintaining this balance, modeling respectful dialogue, and intervening when group dynamics become toxic.

For scam victims, understanding these group pressures is essential. Belonging should never come at the expense of personal authenticity, emotional integrity, or individual recovery. Healthy support groups create space for diverse experiences, validate personal choices, and reinforce each member’s right to heal without conformity-based pressure. Recognizing the difference between belonging and forced alignment helps victims protect their emotional health as they engage with recovery communities.

Consequences of Unchecked Conformity

Traumatized scam victims often enter support spaces, family discussions, or peer groups searching for comfort, understanding, and structure. In these environments, conformity can seem appealing. Aligning with group norms or following others’ advice appears to create stability and connection. However, unchecked conformity carries hidden costs that can worsen emotional harm, delay recovery, and create long-term setbacks for vulnerable individuals. Victims must understand these risks to protect their mental health and maintain control over their recovery choices.

Emotional Exhaustion and Compliance Fatigue

Constantly adjusting one’s emotions, language, or behavior to fit group expectations drains psychological energy. Victims navigating betrayal trauma already experience emotional volatility, low resilience, and cognitive fatigue. When forced to suppress authentic reactions or conform to rigid group standards, they experience even greater emotional exhaustion.

Compliance fatigue develops when individuals repeatedly override their needs or instincts to meet group demands. In scam recovery spaces, this often includes adopting forced positivity, masking anger, silencing grief, or participating in group narratives that feel unnatural. Over time, victims feel depleted, disoriented, and disconnected from their true emotions. They may lose motivation to engage with recovery altogether, perceiving support spaces as additional sources of stress rather than tools for healing.

Identity Fragility and Suppressed Needs

Unchecked conformity damages a victim’s sense of self. After scam trauma, identity often feels unstable. Victims grapple with feelings of shame, self-blame, and worthlessness. When they silence their authentic experiences to match group expectations, their identity becomes further fragmented. They struggle to reconcile their inner reality with the version of themselves they present to others.

Suppressed needs deepen this fragmentation. Victims may deny their desire for rest, privacy, or alternative healing paths because the group discourages them. Some suppress valid anger, confusion, or skepticism to maintain belonging. This leaves essential emotional needs unmet, reinforcing the belief that their true feelings are unacceptable or unworthy of acknowledgment.

False Encouragement and Unrealistic Goals

Toxic positivity and rigid group narratives often promote false encouragement. Victims hear messages that oversimplify recovery, exaggerate progress, or impose unrealistic timelines. Phrases like “you should be over this by now” or “staying strong means never showing pain” create unattainable expectations. Victims who struggle to meet these fabricated goals internalize failure and shame, believing they are weak or incapable of healing.

Unrealistic benchmarks erode confidence. Victims may hide ongoing struggles to appear compliant or strong. This masks their true psychological state, preventing access to meaningful support. Instead of fostering resilience, false encouragement reinforces emotional isolation and deepens recovery setbacks.

Re-traumatization and Group-Induced Aggression

Unchecked conformity can re-traumatize victims by recreating patterns of manipulation and loss of control. Scam experiences often involve deception, coercion, and emotional exploitation. When victims face similar pressure within support spaces, it mirrors their original trauma, triggering emotional collapse.

In some cases, suppressed frustration turns outward as aggression. Victims overwhelmed by group demands, invalidation, or rigid expectations may lash out at others. This aggression fuels hostility within recovery spaces, escalating group tension and reinforcing unhealthy dynamics.

Examples of Harmful Compliance

Victims comply with group pressures in ways that delay healing or increase harm. Some adopt aggressive language in resentment-focused groups, despite feeling uncomfortable with hostility. Others silence expressions of grief in toxic positivity environments, believing sadness is unwelcome. Many follow unrealistic recovery timelines, hiding ongoing distress to avoid judgment.

These patterns illustrate how conformity driven by fear, shame, or desire for acceptance leads victims further from authentic healing. Recovery requires space for diverse emotions, individual pacing, and personal agency. Without these, conformity becomes a barrier to growth rather than a source of support.

Strategies to Maintain Authentic Recovery

Scam victims often face intense pressure to conform, whether from family, friends, support groups, or online communities. This pressure can disrupt recovery and cause setbacks if not handled with awareness and intention. The following strategies provide clear, practical steps victims can use to protect their emotional health and maintain authentic progress.

Self-awareness: Recognizing Internal Discomfort

The first step is building self-awareness around conformity. Victims need to notice when their participation in a group or conversation feels uncomfortable or dishonest. Emotional discomfort, hesitation to speak honestly, or silent agreement with ideas that contradict personal beliefs are signals of unwanted conformity. Victims should pause when they notice these feelings and reflect on whether their actions align with their recovery needs.

Practice Negotiated Belonging

Recovery does not require complete withdrawal from social groups, but it does require boundaries. Victims can practice what experts call “negotiated belonging.” This means balancing connection with authenticity by choosing when and how to share personal information. Victims do not need to disclose every detail or agree with every opinion to belong to a group. They should set clear boundaries around what they discuss, how much they participate, and when to disengage if conversations feel harmful or invalidating.

Diversify Support Networks

Relying on one group for all recovery needs increases vulnerability to conformity. Victims benefit from building a diversified support system that includes trauma-informed professionals, trusted mentors, and spaces where dissenting views are welcomed respectfully. Engaging with different perspectives reduces isolation and creates an environment where victims can develop confidence without constant pressure to conform.

Encourage Empowerment and Assertiveness

Maintaining authentic recovery requires empowerment and assertiveness. Victims must practice expressing their needs, declining harmful conversations, and affirming their recovery goals. They should validate their personal pace of healing, even when others push for faster progress or different outcomes. Assertiveness protects emotional boundaries and reinforces self-trust during every stage of recovery.

Role of Facilitators and Support Leaders

Facilitators and support leaders play a critical role in shaping the culture of recovery groups. Whether in-person or online, these individuals have the responsibility to ensure the group remains a safe, respectful, and empowering space for scam victims to heal. Effective leadership requires more than organizing meetings or moderating discussions. It involves active management of group dynamics to reduce conformity pressure and support authentic recovery for every participant.

Cultivating a Psychologically Safe Group Culture

The foundation of a healthy recovery environment is psychological safety. Facilitators must work intentionally to create a space where all participants feel respected, heard, and valued without fear of judgment or rejection. This requires setting clear expectations for respectful communication, confidentiality, and boundaries. Group members should understand that emotional vulnerability is welcome, but aggression, shaming, or invalidation will not be tolerated.

Leaders should model healthy expression by being transparent about the complexity of recovery. They can share that healing looks different for everyone and that difficult emotions, setbacks, or disagreements are part of the process. When leaders normalize these realities, participants are less likely to feel pressured to conform to unrealistic standards or suppress their experiences.

Normalizing Dissent and Valuing Individual Paths

An important part of reducing group pressure is teaching participants that disagreement is acceptable and necessary. Facilitators should openly state that members are encouraged to question ideas, challenge assumptions, and express different viewpoints without fear of exclusion. This does not mean tolerating hostility or harmful behavior, but it does mean creating space for respectful disagreement.

Leaders must also affirm that recovery is a personal journey. Group members will progress at different rates, face unique challenges, and define healing in diverse ways. Facilitators should reinforce that no single method, timeline, or emotional reaction applies to everyone. Recognizing these differences prevents the group from becoming rigid or driven by conformity.

Training to Identify Group Pressure and Intervene

Facilitators need to develop awareness of subtle group pressure that can arise over time. Warning signs include participants mimicking each other’s language, hesitation to express doubts, or exclusion of those with different perspectives. When these patterns appear, leaders should intervene with reminders about group values, respect for individuality, and the importance of honest dialogue.

Leaders should also watch for signs of emotional burnout, compliance fatigue, or individuals who appear to withdraw from the group. These are indicators that conformity pressure may be affecting participants. In these moments, facilitators can provide reassurance, redirect conversations, and privately check in with affected individuals to offer support.

Effective support leadership protects scam victims from the hidden harms of conformity and fosters a group culture grounded in respect, autonomy, and authentic healing.

Conclusion

Scam victims face many hidden challenges in recovery, and group conformity remains one of the most overlooked. The natural desire for connection after betrayal often leads victims into environments where peer pressure quietly shapes emotions, beliefs, and behaviors. While support groups, friends, and family can provide comfort, they also carry risks when acceptance depends on silence, compliance, or abandoning personal needs.

Authentic recovery requires more than belonging. It demands courage to protect emotional boundaries, question group narratives, and remain connected to personal truth even when facing rejection or misunderstanding. Victims who suppress discomfort, silence doubts, or adopt rigid group expectations lose critical opportunities for growth. Over time, this undermines confidence, damages self-trust, and delays meaningful progress.

The responsibility to prevent harmful conformity does not fall solely on the individual. Group facilitators, support leaders, and loved ones must actively promote spaces where emotional safety, disagreement, and diverse experiences are respected. Healthy recovery communities reject toxic positivity, groupthink, and aggressive behavior. Instead, they prioritize honest dialogue, negotiated belonging, and individualized healing paths.

Victims regain power when they recognize conformity pressure and choose authenticity over forced alignment. This includes setting boundaries, diversifying support systems, and practicing assertiveness in every interaction. Recovery is not a uniform process. Each person brings unique experiences, emotions, and timelines to their healing journey. Respecting these differences protects emotional health and reinforces long-term resilience.

Peer pressure, whether subtle or overt, will always exist within groups. Victims cannot eliminate it entirely, but they can learn to navigate it with awareness and intention. By choosing self-trust, embracing emotional complexity, and prioritizing honest relationships, scam victims build a recovery foundation that is strong, flexible, and truly their own.

Reference

• The Asch Conformity Experiments
• Self-imposed pressure
• When Community Pressures You to Conform
• Normative social influence
• Perfectionism and the high-stakes culture of success
• The Conformity Trap

Please Rate This Article

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment above!