Defeatism and its Impact on Law Enforcement and Scam Victims

How Defeatism Undermines Individual and Collective Efforts in the Fight Against Scams and Impacts Global Law Enforcement and Justice Systems

Primary Category: Psychology of Scams

Author:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

Defeatism is a mindset where individuals or groups believe that failure is inevitable, leading to a lack of effort and a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure. This attitude can spread through society, hindering collective efforts to address significant challenges, such as combatting scams.

In global law enforcement and the justice system, defeatism can result in reduced motivation to pursue criminals, limited international cooperation, and insufficient resources dedicated to fighting scams.

For scam victims, defeatism manifests as a sense of hopelessness, inaction, and resignation, making it difficult for them to recover or seek justice.

Combating defeatism requires proactive efforts, both individually and collectively, to foster resilience and empowerment.

Understanding Defeatism: What It Is, How It Works, and Its Impact on Society, Law Enforcement and Scam Prevention, and on Scam Victims

Defeatism Defined

Defeatism is a mindset characterized by the expectation of failure or the belief that any effort to change a situation is futile. Individuals or groups who exhibit defeatism often give up easily or refuse to take action because they assume that their efforts will be in vain. This attitude can manifest in various aspects of life, from personal challenges to larger societal issues.

How Defeatism Works

Defeatism operates by reinforcing a negative feedback loop. When someone believes that they are bound to fail, they are less likely to take proactive steps to improve their situation. This lack of action often leads to negative outcomes, which then confirm their original belief that failure is inevitable. Over time, defeatism can become a deeply ingrained habit of thought, influencing behavior and decision-making in many areas of life.

The Difference Between A Realist and a Defeatist

The key difference between a realist and a defeatist lies in their perspectives on challenges and outcomes.

A realist acknowledges the difficulties and limitations of a situation but approaches it with a practical mindset. Realists focus on facts and evidence, recognizing potential obstacles while still believing in the possibility of achieving goals through careful planning, strategy, and effort. They aim to find the best possible outcome, even if it means adjusting expectations or taking a more measured approach.

A defeatist, on the other hand, tends to anticipate failure or believe that success is impossible, often giving up before making any significant effort. Defeatists are more likely to focus on the negative aspects of a situation, allowing fear of failure or past disappointments to overshadow potential opportunities. This mindset leads to a lack of motivation and a reluctance to take action, ultimately becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.

While a realist navigates challenges with a balanced and practical approach, a defeatist is paralyzed by the expectation of failure, often giving up before trying.

The Contagious Nature of Defeatism in Society

Defeatism is not just a personal issue; it can spread through communities, organizations, and even entire societies. When individuals within a group start to adopt a defeatist attitude, it can create a ripple effect. Others may begin to share the same outlook, leading to a collective sense of hopelessness or apathy. This is particularly dangerous in situations where collective action is needed to address a problem, such as social injustice, economic challenges, or public health crises.

In society, defeatism can hinder progress and innovation. When people believe that change is impossible, they are less likely to support new ideas or initiatives. This can lead to stagnation and a failure to address pressing issues. In extreme cases, widespread defeatism can contribute to a culture of despair, where people feel powerless to improve their circumstances or challenge the status quo.

Defeatism in Global Law Enforcement and the Justice System

Defeatism can have particularly damaging effects on law enforcement and criminal justice, especially concerning global efforts to combat scams and fraud.

When law enforcement agencies adopt a defeatist attitude, they become less motivated to pursue criminals or invest in new strategies for fighting crime. This can result in a lack of accountability for scammers, who may feel emboldened by the perception that law enforcement is ineffective or indifferent. It also results in reduced reporting since victims do not think law enforcement is taking them seriously.

Defeatism can Manifest in Several Ways:

Underreporting: Victims may choose not to report scams because they believe that nothing will be done. This leads to fewer cases being investigated and less data available to track criminal networks.

Lack of Resources: Law enforcement agencies that are overwhelmed by the scale of the problem may adopt a defeatist mindset, leading to underfunding or a lack of focus on scam prevention.

Ineffective Cooperation: International cooperation is crucial in combating global scams, but defeatism can hinder collaboration between countries, leading to fragmented efforts and allowing scammers to exploit gaps in enforcement.

Understanding Defeatism in Law Enforcement and the Justice System

Defeatism in global law enforcement and the justice system refers to a pervasive sense of futility or resignation in the face of complex and widespread challenges, such as transnational crime, corruption, and large-scale scams. This mindset can manifest in various ways, leading to a lack of motivation, reduced efforts to combat crime, and ultimately, a weakening of the systems meant to protect society.

Manifestations of Defeatism in Global Law Enforcement

Overwhelming Scale of Crime: The sheer scale of transnational crimes, such as human trafficking, drug smuggling, and international scams, can lead to a defeatist attitude among law enforcement agencies. When crimes cross borders and involve sophisticated networks, law enforcement may feel outmatched or incapable of making a meaningful impact. This sense of powerlessness can result in a lack of initiative to pursue complex cases or to collaborate effectively with international counterparts.

Resource Limitations: Many law enforcement agencies, especially in developing countries, operate with limited resources—both financial and technological. This can create a sense of defeatism, where officers believe that they do not have the tools or support needed to effectively combat crime. For example, tracking cybercriminals who use advanced technologies and operate in multiple jurisdictions may seem impossible without the necessary infrastructure, leading to a reluctance to pursue such cases.

Bureaucratic Challenges: The bureaucratic nature of global law enforcement agencies can contribute to defeatism. Complex procedures, slow decision-making processes, and the need to navigate international laws and treaties can hinder timely and effective action. When law enforcement officers encounter repeated delays or roadblocks, they may become disillusioned and less motivated to pursue justice, particularly in cases involving cross-border scams and financial crimes.

Corruption and Lack of Accountability: Corruption within law enforcement and judicial systems can exacerbate defeatism. When officers and prosecutors see that criminals are able to evade justice through bribery or political connections, they may feel that their efforts are pointless. This can lead to a culture of inaction, where law enforcement officers are unwilling to take risks or invest time in investigations that they believe will not lead to meaningful outcomes.

Public Perception and Support: Public perception plays a significant role in law enforcement morale. When communities lose faith in the justice system or perceive it as ineffective, law enforcement agencies may internalize these criticisms, leading to a defeatist attitude. This can result in a vicious cycle where diminished public trust leads to reduced cooperation with law enforcement, further hindering the ability to solve crimes and enforce the law.

Impact of Defeatism on Global Efforts to Combat Scams

Defeatism in global law enforcement has a profound impact on efforts to combat scams, particularly those that are transnational in nature. Scams, especially those involving online platforms, often cross national boundaries, making them difficult to trace and prosecute. When law enforcement agencies adopt a defeatist attitude, several negative outcomes can occur:

Reduced Efforts to Investigate Scams: A defeatist mindset may lead to law enforcement agencies deprioritizing scam investigations. Officers may feel that the likelihood of catching perpetrators, especially those operating from different countries, is too low to justify the resources required. As a result, many scam cases go uninvestigated, leaving victims without justice and enabling scammers to continue their activities with impunity.

Lack of International Cooperation: Defeatism can undermine international cooperation, which is crucial for tackling transnational scams. When law enforcement agencies believe that collaboration with foreign counterparts is unlikely to yield results, they may be less inclined to engage in joint operations or share information. This reluctance can create gaps in global crime-fighting efforts, allowing scams to proliferate across borders.

Erosion of Legal Deterrents: If law enforcement agencies and the justice system are perceived as ineffective in dealing with scams, the deterrent effect of legal consequences is diminished. Scammers may become emboldened, knowing that the chances of being caught and prosecuted are low. This can lead to an increase in scam-related crimes, further straining the resources of law enforcement agencies.

Defeatism in the Judicial System

Defeatism is not limited to law enforcement; it also permeates the judicial system, affecting the prosecution and adjudication of scam cases. Judges, prosecutors, and legal professionals may experience defeatism for several reasons:

Prosecutorial Challenges: Prosecutors may feel overwhelmed by the complexity of scam cases, particularly those involving multiple jurisdictions and sophisticated criminal networks. The difficulty of gathering evidence, securing witness cooperation, and navigating international legal frameworks can lead to a sense of futility, resulting in fewer prosecutions and lighter sentences for those who are caught.

Judicial Backlogs: In many countries, the judicial system is plagued by backlogs, where cases take years to be resolved. This can contribute to a defeatist attitude among legal professionals, who may feel that justice is delayed to the point of being denied. Scam victims, in particular, may suffer from the lengthy wait times for their cases to be heard, leading to further disillusionment with the justice system.

Inconsistent Sentencing: When scam cases do make it to court, inconsistent sentencing can reinforce defeatism. If scammers receive lenient penalties or are allowed to escape with minimal consequences, it can demoralize victims and law enforcement alike. This inconsistency can also send a message to other criminals that the justice system is ineffective, reducing the overall deterrent effect of legal proceedings.

Overcoming Defeatism in Law Enforcement and the Justice System

Addressing defeatism in global law enforcement and the justice system requires concerted efforts to build capacity, enhance cooperation, and restore public trust. Some strategies include:

Investing in Resources: Providing law enforcement agencies with the necessary resources, including training, technology, and funding, can help overcome defeatism by empowering officers to tackle complex scams effectively. Investment in cybersecurity and cross-border investigative tools is particularly important for combating online scams.

Strengthening International Cooperation: Encouraging and facilitating international cooperation among law enforcement agencies is crucial for combating transnational scams. This can be achieved through information-sharing agreements, joint task forces, and coordinated operations that transcend national boundaries.

Promoting Accountability and Transparency: Addressing corruption within law enforcement and the justice system is essential for restoring confidence and reducing defeatism. Transparent processes, accountability mechanisms, and anti-corruption initiatives can help ensure that justice is served and that criminals are held accountable for their actions.

Enhancing Public Awareness and Support: Building public trust in law enforcement and the justice system is key to overcoming defeatism. Public awareness campaigns, community engagement, and transparent communication can help bridge the gap between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve.

Providing Support for Legal Professionals: Supporting prosecutors, judges, and other legal professionals with specialized training in handling complex scam cases can help reduce the sense of overwhelm and defeatism. Ensuring that these professionals have the tools and knowledge needed to prosecute scam cases effectively is essential for maintaining the integrity of the justice system.

Defeatism in global law enforcement and the justice system poses a significant challenge to combating scams and other forms of transnational crime. This mindset can lead to reduced efforts, lack of cooperation, and weakened deterrents, ultimately allowing scammers to operate with impunity. However, by addressing the root causes of defeatism and empowering law enforcement and legal professionals with the necessary resources and support, it is possible to restore confidence in the justice system and improve the effectiveness of global crime-fighting efforts.

Defeatism in Scam Victims

For scam victims, defeatism can be particularly debilitating. After experiencing the trauma of being scammed, victims usually feel powerless to recover or seek justice. This mindset can prevent them from taking important steps to protect themselves in the future, such as reporting the crime, seeking support, or educating themselves about scams.

Defeatism in scam victims often manifests as:

Resignation: Victims may believe that they are doomed to be scammed again, leading them to withdraw from social interactions or avoid online activities.

Inaction: The belief that reporting the scam won’t make a difference can stop victims from alerting authorities or seeking help, which in turn allows scammers to continue their activities unchecked.

Hopelessness: Victims may feel overwhelmed by the emotional and financial impact of the scam, leading to a sense of hopelessness that can affect their overall well-being and recovery.

Understanding Defeatism in Scam Victims

Defeatism is a mindset where individuals feel powerless, expecting failure regardless of their actions. For scam victims, this mindset often takes root after the traumatic experience of being deceived and exploited. The emotional and psychological toll of being scammed can lead victims to feel that they are unable to recover, that their efforts to seek justice or repair their lives will be futile, and that they are destined to remain trapped in the aftermath of the scam.

Manifestations of Defeatism in Scam Victims

Resignation to Victimhood: After being scammed, many victims develop a sense of resignation. They may believe that the damage is done and nothing can be done to reverse it. This resignation can prevent them from seeking help or taking proactive steps to protect themselves in the future. For example, a victim might avoid reporting the scam to authorities because they believe it won’t lead to any meaningful action.

Avoidance and Withdrawal: Defeatism can lead to social withdrawal and avoidance of activities that once brought joy or connection. Scam victims might withdraw from online platforms, fearing further deception, or they may isolate themselves from friends and family due to shame or embarrassment. This isolation only reinforces the feeling of defeat, making recovery even more difficult.

Inaction and Lack of Advocacy: Some scam victims may feel that fighting back against the scammers or advocating for justice is pointless. This inaction can stem from a belief that the justice system is inadequate or that the scale of the problem is too large for their efforts to make a difference. As a result, they might avoid participating in support groups, refuse to educate themselves about scams, or fail to take protective measures for the future.

Hopelessness and Depression: The emotional impact of being scammed often leads to feelings of hopelessness. Victims may feel that their financial losses are insurmountable, that they will never regain their trust in others, or that they will never recover emotionally. This hopelessness can manifest as depression, anxiety, or a sense of being stuck in a cycle of despair.

Self-Blame and Guilt: Defeatism in scam victims is often accompanied by self-blame and guilt. Victims may believe that they are somehow at fault for being scammed, that they should have seen the warning signs, or that they are inherently gullible or naïve. This self-blame exacerbates the defeatist mindset, making it harder for victims to seek help or forgive themselves.

The Impact of Defeatism on Recovery

Defeatism can significantly impede a scam victim’s ability to recover both psychologically and emotionally. When victims believe that recovery is impossible or that their situation cannot improve, they are less likely to engage in activities that could lead to healing. This mindset can prevent them from accessing the support they need, whether it’s through counseling, financial assistance, or simply reaching out to loved ones.

Moreover, defeatism can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. By expecting failure or believing that nothing can be done, victims may inadvertently reinforce their negative experiences. For example, a victim who avoids reporting the scam might miss out on potential legal recourse or restitution, further entrenching their sense of hopelessness.

Overcoming Defeatism in Scam Victims

Overcoming defeatism requires a shift in mindset, where victims are encouraged to recognize their strength, reclaim their agency, and take steps toward recovery. Here are some strategies that can help:

Education and Awareness: Victims can benefit from learning about the psychology of scams and understanding that they are not alone. Education can empower victims to see that scams are designed to deceive even the most vigilant individuals, which can help reduce feelings of self-blame and guilt.

Seeking Support: Engaging with support groups, whether online or in-person, can provide victims with a sense of community and validation. Hearing from others who have gone through similar experiences can help victims see that recovery is possible and that they are not alone in their journey.

Professional Counseling: Therapy, especially cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), can be instrumental in helping victims challenge defeatist thoughts and develop healthier coping mechanisms. Counselors can guide victims in processing their emotions, rebuilding their self-esteem, and setting realistic goals for recovery.

Taking Small Steps: Encouraging victims to take small, manageable steps toward recovery can help build confidence and counter defeatist thinking. Whether it’s reporting the scam, reconnecting with loved ones, or setting new financial goals, these steps can help victims regain a sense of control and agency.

Reframing the Narrative: Helping victims reframe their experience from one of failure to one of learning and growth can be a powerful tool. By viewing the scam as a challenge they have survived rather than a failure, victims can begin to see themselves as resilient and capable of overcoming adversity.

Defeatism is a significant barrier to recovery for scam victims, manifesting in various ways that can impede healing and prolong suffering. By recognizing and addressing defeatist thinking, victims can begin to reclaim their power, take proactive steps toward recovery, and ultimately move forward with their lives. Combatting defeatism requires a combination of education, support, and self-compassion, enabling victims to rebuild their confidence and embrace a more hopeful future.

Overcoming Defeatism

Addressing defeatism requires both individual and collective efforts. On a personal level, individuals can challenge defeatist thoughts by focusing on positive outcomes, setting achievable goals, and seeking support from others. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and other forms of counseling can be effective in helping people reframe their thinking and adopt a more optimistic outlook.

On a societal level, combating defeatism involves fostering a culture of resilience and empowerment. This can be achieved by highlighting success stories, providing resources for those affected by scams, and encouraging proactive measures in both personal and professional settings. Law enforcement agencies can play a crucial role by demonstrating their commitment to tackling scams, investing in training and resources, and fostering international cooperation.

Summary

Defeatism is a pervasive and harmful mindset that can hinder individual and collective efforts to address challenges, including the global fight against scams. Recognizing and addressing defeatism is essential for fostering a culture of resilience and empowerment both for scam victims and society as a whole. By taking proactive steps to combat defeatism, we can create a more effective and just system for preventing and responding to scams.

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

Did you find this article useful?

If you did, please help the SCARS Institute to continue helping Scam Victims to become Survivors.

Your gift helps us continue our work and help more scam victims to find the path to recovery!

You can give at donate.AgainstScams.org

Important Information for New Scam Victims

If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org

If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Note About Labeling!

We often use the term ‘scam victim’ in our articles, but this is a convenience to help those searching for information in search engines like Google. It is just a convenience and has no deeper meaning. If you have come through such an experience, YOU are a Survivor! It was not your fault. You are not alone! Axios!

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

SCARS Resources:

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

PLEASE NOTE: Psychology Clarification

The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:

  • Diagnosis: The diagnosis of mental, emotional, or brain disorders and related behaviors.
  • Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that focuses on helping individuals to understand and resolve unconscious conflicts.
  • Hypnosis: Hypnosis is a state of trance in which individuals are more susceptible to suggestion. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including anxiety, depression, and pain.
  • Biofeedback: Biofeedback is a type of therapy that teaches individuals to control their bodily functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety, and pain.
  • Behavioral analysis: Behavioral analysis is a type of therapy that focuses on changing individuals’ behaviors. It is often used to treat conditions such as autism and ADHD.
    Neuropsychology: Neuropsychology is a type of psychology that focuses on the relationship between the brain and behavior. It is often used to assess and treat cognitive impairments caused by brain injuries or diseases.

SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.

SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.

SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.

It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX-RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2023 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org