Invasion of the Body Snatchers – The Monsters Behind the Stolen Human Faces – An Essay About Trust

Monsters in Disguise: Philosophical Reflections on Trust, Honesty, Deception, and Identity in Scam Victimization

Primary Category: Scam Victim Recovery Psychology

Intended Audience: Scam Victims-Survivors / Family & Friends

Author:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

Stories like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, and The Host resonate because they expose a primal fear—encountering something inhuman wearing a human face. For scam victims, that metaphor is not fictional. It mirrors their reality. The person who spoke kindly, promised love or partnership, and seemed genuine was in fact a mask for something predatory. Philosophers like Onora O’Neill, Katherine Hawley, and Sissela Bok help explain why these betrayals cut so deep: because they destroy the very trust that human connection depends on.

When you are deceived at that level, you not only lose faith in others, you also begin to mistrust yourself. Victims often echo the same emotional arc as characters in these horror films—suspicion, paranoia, and self-doubt—as they try to make sense of how they were fooled. The psychological damage is not just sadness or anger. It is the existential confusion of not knowing who is safe, or even whether your own instincts can be trusted again. That is why comparing these narratives to scam trauma is more than symbolic. It offers a framework for understanding how deception undermines identity, isolates victims, and damages the foundation of trust. In both fiction and reality, recovery begins when you acknowledge the betrayal without blaming yourself and begin to reclaim your ability to judge what is real.

The Body Snatchers, Monsters in Disguise: Philosophical Reflections on Trust, Honesty, Deception, and Identity in Scam Victimization

In various narratives, from ancient myths to modern films, the motif of entities masquerading as humans has been a powerful symbol of deception and betrayal. Stories like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, and The Host depict creatures that seamlessly blend into human society, hiding their true, often malevolent, nature. These tales resonate deeply with the experiences of scam victims, who often find themselves betrayed by individuals who presented themselves as trustworthy and genuine.

The concept of monsters disguised as humans, as depicted in these films and offers a chilling metaphor for relationship scams, where scammers impersonate trustworthy individuals but harbor harmful intentions. Both scenarios explore themes of trust, betrayal, and the erosion of self-trust, raising profound philosophical questions about identity, deception, and human connection. Below, we will also examine philosophers who have addressed trust, distrust, and deception in ways that resonate with these narratives, then explore how victims of relationship scams mirror the distrust and self-doubt experienced by characters in these stories, drawing parallels to the psychological and existential impacts.

Why Do These Stories Resonate with Humans?

These stories resonate so deeply because they tap into a primal tension within human psychology: the need to feel safe among others and the simultaneous fear that danger may hide behind a familiar face. For most of human history, survival depended on our ability to accurately read social cues, detect threats, and form reliable alliances. Stories like The Thing or Invasion of the Body Snatchers exaggerate this fear by introducing characters who appear completely trustworthy but are, in fact, something else entirely. They speak to our most basic anxiety—that we might not be able to tell friend from foe until it is too late.

This fear is not irrational. In evolutionary terms, our brains are wired to assess risk quickly, often before conscious thought even begins. We feel discomfort around deception because it violates the fundamental assumption that our senses and social instincts will guide us toward safety. That is why the idea of a monster perfectly imitating a human being is so disturbing: it signals that our deepest instincts can be fooled. The fear is not just of the monster, but of the failure of our own intuition and our own instincts.

At the same time, society teaches us to override those instincts. We are raised to be polite, to assume the best in others, and to suppress suspicion in favor of openness. In modern life, where many interactions occur online or across cultural boundaries, we are often rewarded for trusting strangers; getting a job, forming relationships, or building networks depends on it. Over time, this creates a gap between what our instincts tell us and what we’ve been conditioned to believe is appropriate behavior.

Scammers exploit that gap. They imitate trustworthiness, mimic intimacy, and manufacture credibility. And because victims often want connection or support, they suppress the subtle warnings inside them: feelings of unease, inconsistencies in the story, a voice saying something isn’t right. The betrayal cuts so deeply, not just because someone lied, but because it reveals the limits of your own self-trust.

These stories endure because they help you process that paradox. They validate your fear of being deceived, while also allowing you to examine how and why you trusted. They are cautionary tales wrapped in metaphor, giving you a language for something your nervous system may have felt but your conscious mind could not yet explain.

The Stories/Movies We Are Exploring

​Invasion of the Body Snatchers

Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a psychological science fiction thriller that explores the terrifying breakdown of trust and identity in a seemingly ordinary American town. The story follows a doctor who slowly uncovers that people around him are being replaced by identical impostors—emotionless replicas created by alien seed pods. These duplicates look and sound exactly like the originals, but lack empathy, individuality, and human warmth. As more citizens are overtaken, the protagonist finds himself increasingly isolated, unable to convince others of the threat, and unsure of who can be trusted. The film creates a chilling sense of paranoia by highlighting how deception can take root in everyday life, turning familiarity into danger. Its lasting impact comes from its central fear: that the people you love may no longer be who they appear to be, and that you might not even know when you’ve lost yourself.

The Host

The Host (2013), directed by Andrew Niccol and based on Stephenie Meyer’s novel, presents a future where Earth has been overtaken by alien entities known as “Souls.” These parasitic beings inhabit human bodies, erasing their consciousness while retaining memories, creating a facade of normalcy. The narrative centers on Melanie Stryder, a young woman whose body becomes host to a Soul named Wanderer. However, Melanie’s consciousness resists suppression, leading to an internal struggle between the two. As they navigate this coexistence, Wanderer begins to empathize with humanity, particularly as she forms bonds with Melanie’s loved ones. This internal conflict mirrors the external resistance against the alien occupation, highlighting themes of identity, autonomy, and the essence of humanity. The film delves into the complexities of duality within a single being and the broader implications of an invasion that is both physical and psychological.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1517260/plotsummary/

John Carpenter’s The Thing

John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982) was based on the 1938 novella Who Goes There? by John W. Campbell Jr., originally published under the pseudonym Don A. Stuart. The story centers on a group of scientists and military personnel isolated at an Antarctic research station who discover an alien lifeform capable of perfectly imitating any living organism. As suspicion spreads and paranoia takes hold, no one can tell who is human and who is the creature. This theme of identity, trust, and internal corruption became the psychological foundation of Carpenter’s film.

The Thing (1982) is a psychological science fiction horror film set in the isolation of an Antarctic research outpost. The story follows a team of American researchers who come into contact with a mysterious organism unearthed from the ice. Initially mistaken for a dead alien, the creature reveals its terrifying ability: it can perfectly replicate any living being it absorbs. As the men realize that any one of them could already be “the thing,” paranoia consumes the camp. Trust collapses, alliances fracture, and survival becomes a race against both the cold and the creeping uncertainty of who is still human. The film builds its tension not through spectacle alone, but by exploring the fear of infiltration, identity loss, and the collapse of trust when something monstrous wears a familiar face.

Victims’ Trust Crisis: Mirroring Fictional Narratives

The victims of relationship scams and the characters in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, and The Host share a profound loss of trust, not only in others but in their own ability to discern truth. In these stories, monsters perfectly mimic humans, sowing paranoia and existential dread; in real life, scammers impersonate caring partners, leaving victims with similar psychological scars. Below, I explore how these experiences converge, focusing on trust erosion and self-doubt.

Loss of Trust in Others

Fictional Parallel: In Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Miles Bennell watches his town succumb to pod people who replicate loved ones, stripping away individuality and emotion. He can no longer trust friends or neighbors, as their appearance hides an alien intent to assimilate. In The Thing, MacReady’s blood test reveals hidden monsters, but until then, every colleague is a potential threat, fostering isolation. In The Host, the alien-controlled Melanie deceives those who love her, blurring the line between ally and enemy.

Real-World Echo: Relationship scam victims experience a similar betrayal. Scammers craft convincing personas—using stolen photos, heartfelt messages, or fake emergencies—to mimic genuine partners. A 2024 FTC report notes that romance scams cost victims $1.14 billion, with many losing thousands to “lovers” who vanish after gaining trust. Victims, like fictional characters, become wary of everyone. A woman scammed out of $50,000 might avoid dating, fearing every suitor is a “monster” hiding selfish motives, mirroring Miles’ paranoia as he flees pod-people.

Erosion of Self-Trust

Fictional Parallel: In these films, characters question their own judgment as monsters imitate humans flawlessly. In The Thing, MacReady wonders if he’s already infected, as the creature’s assimilation is undetectable until it acts. In Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Miles doubts his perceptions when others insist the pod people are “normal.” In The Host, the human Melanie fights to reclaim her identity from the alien within, unsure if she can trust her own thoughts. This self-doubt stems from the monsters’ ability to infiltrate and replicate, leaving victims uncertain of their own humanity.

Real-World Echo: Scam victims face a parallel crisis. After discovering a “partner” was a fraud, they question how they missed the signs. A 2022 study on betrayal trauma notes that such deception can shatter self-trust, as victims feel they failed to judge character accurately. For example, a victim who sent $10,000 to a scammer posing as a deployed soldier might doubt their instincts, asking, “Can I trust myself if I fell for this?” This mirrors the existential dread of The Thing’s characters, who fear they might already be “taken over” by the monster within.

Paranoia and Social Isolation

Fictional Parallel: The films depict a world where trust is impossible. In Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Miles becomes a fugitive, unable to join society without risking assimilation. In The Thing, the outpost crew turns on each other, burning potential allies to avoid infection. In The Host, characters like Jared isolate themselves, distrusting even those they love. The monsters’ perfect imitation means no one is safe, creating a claustrophobic atmosphere of suspicion.

Real-World Echo: Scam victims often withdraw from relationships, fearing further betrayal. A 2023 Fraud.org report highlights how victims of offline fraud, including romance scams, develop chronic distrust, impacting friendships and family ties. A victim who lost savings to a fake fiancé might avoid social media or dating apps, akin to Miles hiding from pod people. This isolation stems from the scammer’s “monstrous” impersonation, which, like the aliens, exploits trust to harm.

The Philosophical Underpinnings of Deception

Philosophers have long grappled with the nature of deception and its impact on human relationships. Bernard Williams, in his exploration of truth and truthfulness, emphasizes that deception is not merely about conveying falsehoods but involves a profound breach of trust. This breach undermines the very fabric of interpersonal relationships, leading to a sense of betrayal and disorientation. ​

Philosophers like Sissela Bok and Katherine Hawley suggest that betrayal’s harm extends far beyond financial loss, infecting how victims “make sense of their lives.” In both fiction and reality, the “monster” (alien or scammer) exploits trust to dehumanize victims, leaving them questioning reality. Onora O’Neill’s call for earned trust through observable actions offers hope, but for victims, rebuilding trust is daunting when even self-trust is compromised. Elizabeth Fricker’s work on epistemic harm underscores the injustice of being deceived, as victims’ rational trust is weaponized against them, much like characters trusting human-appearing monsters.

See below in the Addendum for more about this.

The Monster Within: Cultural Representations of Hidden Malevolence

The idea of something inhuman hiding behind a human face has deep roots in culture. From ancient mythologies to contemporary horror films, this theme serves as a powerful metaphor for deception, betrayal, and the erosion of trust. Folklore across many cultures tells of shape-shifters, demons, or spirits that assume human form in order to seduce, deceive, or destroy. These tales were not just entertainment. They acted as social warnings, reminding people that danger often wears a familiar smile. Whether it is the Greek sirens luring sailors to their doom or the biblical warnings about false prophets, the core message is the same: the most dangerous threats are the ones you fail to recognize until it is too late.

This narrative continues in modern storytelling, especially in science fiction and horror. Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, and The Host stand out as films that dramatize the horror of discovering that someone you trust is not who they seem. These monsters do not attack from the outside. They take over from within. They mimic their victims perfectly, hiding malevolence behind familiar eyes. The tension in these stories comes from the same psychological rupture that scam victims experience. The person you shared your life with, confided in, maybe even loved, turns out to have been wearing a mask all along. What makes these films resonate so deeply is not just the fear of being hunted, but the fear of being fooled. They tap into the terror of discovering that trust itself can be weaponized against you. Just as the characters in these stories begin to question everyone around them, scam victims often reach a point where they no longer know who to trust, including themselves.

These stories endure because they express something primal. The fear of losing control, of being surrounded by threats disguised as allies, and of slowly realizing that safety was always an illusion. The parallels to relationship scams are chilling. In both cases, victims are not simply attacked. They are studied, targeted, and deceived by something that knows exactly how to wear a human face. The monster is not just a creature. It is the betrayal of intimacy. It is the violation of belief. And it is the haunting realization that evil does not always announce itself. Sometimes it whispers kindly, smiles warmly, and waits until you are alone.

The Psychological Impact on Victims

When you discover that someone you trusted was not who they claimed to be, it creates a rupture in your sense of emotional and psychological stability. The betrayal is not just personal, it feels existential. This is Cognitive Dissonance. Being deceived by a scammer who adopted a false identity to manipulate you can produce an internal crisis marked by confusion, shame, and self-condemnation. You might ask yourself, “How did I not see this?” or “What does this say about me?” These questions are not just cognitive. They are emotional trauma, wounds that affect how you relate to yourself and the world around you.

This kind of deception generates a unique form of trauma. The person you confided in, hoped with, or even loved, did not exist. They were a constructed persona, engineered to mimic emotional authenticity. That realization doesn’t just hurt. It destabilizes your internal framework for recognizing safety and truth. Neurologically, it activates the amygdala, your brain’s alarm system, producing a state of ongoing threat awareness (hyperactivation). As a result, your nervous system may remain in a prolonged state of hyperarousal, making it difficult to sleep, concentrate, or feel safe even in neutral environments; this is the definition of PTSD. This is why many scam victims report symptoms that resemble post-traumatic stress: flashbacks, startle responses, intrusive thoughts, and emotional numbing.

The comparison to horror stories where monsters wear human faces is not just symbolic—it is neurologically appropriate. Just as characters in The Thing or Invasion of the Body Snatchers become paranoid, unsure who they can trust, scam victims often find themselves questioning everyone in their lives. You may even begin to doubt yourself. “If I was fooled once, could it happen again?” This loss of internal trust can be more damaging than the financial loss itself.

The psychological recovery process must address both the emotional fallout and the neurological imbalance. Re-establishing a sense of safety requires Mindfulness & Psychological grounding techniques that regulate your nervous system. Rebuilding trust involves slow, deliberate exposure to healthy relationships and validation from others who understand. Most importantly, healing begins when you stop viewing your trust as a flaw and start understanding it as a strength that was deliberately exploited. By naming the experience for what it was: predation, you begin to recover your sense of self and reclaim the boundaries that were violated.

Seeing Scammers as Monsters – at Least for a While​

There is a real psychological benefit for scam victims, especially in the early stages of recovery, when scam victims allow themselves to disconnect from the perceived humanity of the scammer and view them instead as something monstrous or inhuman. This reframing, though it may seem harsh or simplistic, can serve as an emotional survival mechanism. When you’ve been deeply betrayed, especially in a relationship scam where the deception was personal and prolonged, the shock is not just about what was done to you. It’s about who did it. You believed this was a person you could trust, someone with a heart, someone who cared. That illusion collapsing is emotionally devastating. Seeing the scammer(s) as a monster allows you to separate the predator from the fantasy they created.

This temporary disconnection helps clarify the truth: the person you loved never existed. They were a mask. The kindness, the empathy, the shared dreams, these were part of the con, not glimpses of a misunderstood human being. Monsters, in a symbolic sense, are easier to reject. They do not deserve your compassion. They do not ask for your forgiveness. This mental distancing creates space between you and the abuser(s). It allows your nervous system to reduce the emotional entanglement and begin the work of detachment, which is a necessary part of healing.

Over time, many victims eventually come to understand that scammers are human beings who made brutal, criminal choices. But seeing them as monsters in the beginning stages allows you to bypass any instinct to justify their behavior, romanticize the experience, or minimize the damage. Just like the infected in The Thing or the duplicates in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, the scammer was wearing a skin that wasn’t theirs. You weren’t in a real relationship. You were in a psychological trap. Accepting that the figure who hurt you is not who you thought they were is often the first step toward reclaiming clarity and rebuilding trust in yourself.

This perspective also helps protect against the dangerous reflex of self-blame. If you continue to see the scammer as a flawed but real person who had feelings, then your mind may try to make sense of the betrayal by blaming yourself—“what did I do wrong, why wasn’t I enough, how could I not see it?” But if you let yourself acknowledge that this was predatory behavior, planned and executed with intent, you stop trying to fix something that was never real in the first place. That shift from “I failed in a relationship” to “I was targeted by a predator” is profound. It moves you from shame toward strength.

This is why we instruct scam victims to think of the scammers as a team. Not only is it accurate, but that also helps to diminish their humanity. But monsters may be a more useful metaphor for some.

Rebuilding Trust and Identity

Recovering from the emotional collapse that follows a scam is not a quick process. It is a gradual journey that begins with acknowledging the depth of what was lost—not only in terms of finances or time, but in the form of violated trust, identity confusion, and personal disorientation. When someone deceives you by pretending to be someone else, they do not just take advantage of your kindness or vulnerability. They fracture your understanding of who you are in relation to others. You might find yourself asking, “How did I let this happen?” or “What does this say about who I am?” These questions are painful, but they are also necessary. Honest self-reflection is the foundation of healing, and it helps to begin restoring the sense of agency that scams attempt to steal.

Philosophers like Søren Kierkegaard have written about the despair that arises when your lived experience no longer aligns with your internal values. Scam trauma produces exactly this kind of misalignment. You may feel that you betrayed your own intuition or sense of self, even though you were manipulated by a professional deceiver. Recognizing this misalignment is the first step toward reintegration. With time and attention, you can begin to reconnect with your values, your judgment, and the parts of yourself that were overshadowed by the trauma.

Support is essential in this process. When you share your story with others who understand, or when you work with a therapist who can help you name and navigate your emotions, you create a framework for recovery. Talking about your experience doesn’t just unburden you emotionally. It begins to correct the false narratives that often accompany trauma: that you were weak, naive, or somehow to blame. In reality, you were targeted. And those who target others for personal gain are accountable for their actions. This shift in perspective is empowering. It allows you to see the event not as a reflection of your identity, but as something that happened to you—something that you are capable of recovering from.

Part of rebuilding trust involves learning how scams work. Understanding the psychological tactics used by fraudsters, such as emotional anchoring, urgency, mirroring, and manufactured crises, helps you recognize that these manipulations are not a reflection of your worth or intelligence. They are evidence of calculated, deliberate exploitation. The more you learn about how these tactics function, the more equipped you become to identify them in the future. Knowledge doesn’t just guard you against further harm. It helps rebuild your confidence in your own judgment.

Re-establishing your identity also means giving yourself permission to change. The person you were before the scam may feel distant or unreachable, but that version of you is not lost. In fact, you may find that you emerge with greater clarity, stronger boundaries, and a deeper understanding of what trust really means. That is not because the scam improved you; it is because you chose to grow in spite of it. Healing does not mean returning to who you were. It means becoming someone more whole, more self-aware, and more committed to living in alignment with your true values.

You are not defined by the betrayal. You are defined by your capacity to rebuild. And every step you take toward reclaiming your voice, your boundaries, and your identity is a step away from the grip of the deception—and a step toward living more fully, more clearly, and more securely in your own truth.

Conclusion

The parallels between Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, The Host, and relationship scams highlight a universal fear: beings who look and act human but intend harm. Philosophers like O’Neill, Hawley, Fricker, Bok, Austin, and Anscombe illuminate the dynamics of trust and deception, showing why such betrayals devastate victims. In both fiction and reality, victims lose faith in others and themselves, grappling with paranoia and self-doubt as they question who or what is trustworthy. Just as Miles, MacReady, or Melanie (story characters) face monsters that mimic humanity, scam victims confront scammers whose false personas exploit emotional bonds, leaving scars that echo the existential terror of these stories. Recognizing these parallels can help victims rebuild trust, starting with small, verifiable steps, though the journey remains fraught with the shadow of “monsters” disguised as humans.

The motif of monsters in disguise serves as a powerful metaphor for the experiences of scam victims. Philosophical explorations of deception and trust provide valuable frameworks for understanding the depth of betrayal and the path to healing. By acknowledging the pain, seeking support, and embracing the journey of recovery, victims can reclaim their sense of self and move forward with renewed strength and resilience.

Addendum

Philosophers on Trust, Deception, and Impersonation

Several philosophers have explored trust, distrust, and the moral implications of deception, which align with the themes of monsters disguised as humans and the duplicity of scammers. Their work provides a framework for understanding the betrayal inherent in both fictional and real-world scenarios:

Onora O’Neill

Relevant Work: O’Neill’s 2002 BBC Reith Lectures, “A Question of Trust,” examine trust as a critical component of social and personal relationships, emphasizing its fragility in the face of deception.

Connection to Theme: O’Neill argues that trust is not blind faith but a reasoned judgment based on evidence of reliability. In Invasion of the Body Snatchers, characters like Dr. Miles Bennell struggle to discern who is human and who is a pod-person, mirroring how scam victims must reassess trust when scammers convincingly mimic genuine partners. O’Neill’s insight that deception undermines the “clarity of thought and expression” needed for trust applies to scammers who use fabricated personas to exploit victims, leaving them questioning all relationships. She suggests that rebuilding trust requires transparent, verifiable actions, a challenge for both scam victims and fictional characters facing imposters who perfectly imitate humans.

Katherine Hawley

Relevant Work: In How to Be Trustworthy (2019), Hawley defines trust as believing someone has a commitment to fulfill an expectation and relying on them to do so, while distrust involves not relying on that commitment despite believing it exists.

Connection to Theme: Hawley’s framework illuminates the betrayal in The Thing, where characters like MacReady cannot rely on colleagues who appear human but may be shape-shifting aliens. Similarly, in relationship scams, victims trust scammers who mimic romantic partners, only to discover their commitments were false. Hawley’s focus on warranted distrust—when evidence suggests someone is untrustworthy—parallels victims’ post-scam realization that they misjudged a “monster” disguised as a lover. Her work suggests that victims’ subsequent distrust of others, and even themselves, stems from this violated reliance, echoing the paranoia in The Thing where no one can be certain who is human.

Elizabeth Fricker

Relevant Work: Fricker’s work on testimonial injustice explores harm caused by unwarranted distrust, particularly when prejudice leads to dismissing someone’s credibility.

Connection to Theme: While Fricker focuses on epistemic harm, her ideas extend to the harm scammers inflict by exploiting trust. In The Host, the parasitic aliens control human bodies, deceiving loved ones who trust their appearance, much like scammers who craft convincing online personas. Fricker’s notion of a “defeasible obligation to trust testifiers” suggests that victims are justified in initially trusting someone who appears genuine, but the betrayal by aliens or scammers creates a lasting harm that erodes confidence in judging others. This mirrors the self-doubt of scam victims, who question their ability to discern real from fake after being deceived by a “monster” posing as human.

Sissela Bok

Relevant Work: In Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life (1978), Bok examines the ethical implications of deception, arguing that lies erode trust and harm both the deceiver and the deceived.

Connection to Theme: Bok’s analysis of lying as a betrayal that “shatters the reality of others” resonates with both Invasion of the Body Snatchers and relationship scams. In the film, pod-people replicate humans perfectly, destroying trust in personal relationships, just as scammers use false identities to exploit emotional bonds. Bok notes that deception can lead to a “shocking and painful realization” of a partner’s secret life, directly applicable to scam victims who discover their “lover” was a fiction. Her work suggests that the psychological damage—distrust in others and self—stems from the deliberate intent to harm, a trait shared by fictional monsters and real-world scammers.

J. L. Austin and G. E. M. Anscombe

Relevant Work: Austin (1946) and Anscombe (1979) argue that refusing to trust someone’s testimony can be an insult, implying a moral obligation to trust unless evidence suggests otherwise.

Connection to Theme: In The Thing, the characters’ refusal to trust each other escalates paranoia, as each could be an alien. Similarly, scam victims initially trust their “partner” because they have no reason to doubt their testimony (e.g., love letters, photos). When the deception is revealed, victims feel insulted and betrayed, questioning their judgment. Austin and Anscombe’s work highlights why victims might feel naive for trusting, yet also why such trust was rational before the betrayal, paralleling the initial trust characters place in human-appearing figures in these films.

Reference

• Strudler, Alan, ‘Deception and Trust’, in Clancy Martin (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception (2009; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327939.003.0009, accessed 21 Apr. 2025.
• https://billmoyers.com/content/sissela-bok/
• https://www.perlego.com/knowledge/study-guides/what-is-monster-theory/
• https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-philosophy-of-deception/
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_guise
• https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1057&context=lib_faculty

Please Rate This Article

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

• on A Reflection on Christ’s Suffering and Radical Acceptance of the Worst Possible Outcome – 2025: “A strong message, especially at this time of Easter!” Apr 19, 23:16
• on A Small Drop Of Insight About Victims’ Trauma: “This lesson was very impactful for me. I have experiences these short-circuit flashbacks and it does bring back the trauma.…” Apr 19, 16:05
• on What is Karma – Not From an Eastern Perspective But From a Psychological Point of View – 2025: “This is so informative! It is absolutely what I see daily and it is a trap anyone can fall into…” Apr 19, 15:43
• on The Little Mermaid – A Tale of Self-Deception – A Cautionary Story for Scam Victims – 2025: “This is an appeal not only to parents, grandparents but also teachers. Let’s teach the young to distinguish good from…” Apr 19, 10:46
• on What is Karma – Not From an Eastern Perspective But From a Psychological Point of View – 2025: “This is a completely different perspective of karma, that I wasn’t familiar with. I always thought of it as: you…” Apr 18, 20:11
• on The Deception of Peter Pan – A New View of a Favorite Story – 2025: “The comparisons to what we’ve each experienced to a children’s tale that’s so familiar is a great way to explain…” Apr 18, 19:07
• on The Deception of Peter Pan – A New View of a Favorite Story – 2025: “You are right. But the more we look through the lens of criminology, the more we see the patterns.” Apr 18, 16:18
• on Are You A Serial Scam Victim? Do You Know One? – 2024: “You are doing great!” Apr 18, 16:18
• on The Deception of Peter Pan – A New View of a Favorite Story – 2025: “When you dive deep into the stories and realize how they compare to scams it’s amazing” Apr 18, 09:36
• on The Deception of Peter Pan – A New View of a Favorite Story – 2025: “Who would have thought to compare these stories , but it does open your eyes seeing how the deception compares…” Apr 18, 09:35

Important Information for New Scam Victims
Please visit www.ScamVictimsSupport.org – a SCARS Website for New Scam Victims & Sextortion Victims
SCARS Institute now offers a free recovery program at www.SCARSeducation.org
Please visit www.ScamPsychology.org – to more fully understand the psychological concepts involved in scams and scam victim recovery

If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org

If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

SCARS Resources:
Getting Started: ScamVictimsSupport.org
FREE enrollment in the SCARS Institute training programs for scam victims SCARSeducation.org
For New Victims of Relationship Scams newvictim.AgainstScams.org
Subscribe to SCARS Newsletter newsletter.againstscams.org
Sign up for SCARS professional support & recovery groups, visit support.AgainstScams.org
Find competent trauma counselors or therapists, visit counseling.AgainstScams.org
Become a SCARS Member and get free counseling benefits, visit membership.AgainstScams.org
Report each and every crime, learn how to at reporting.AgainstScams.org
Learn more about Scams & Scammers at RomanceScamsNOW.com and ScamsNOW.com
Learn more about the Psychology of Scams and Scam Victims: ScamPsychology.org
Self-Help Books for Scam Victims are at shop.AgainstScams.org
Worldwide Crisis Hotlines: International Suicide Hotlines – OpenCounseling : OpenCounseling
Campaign To End Scam Victim Blaming – 2024 (scamsnow.com)

Psychology Disclaimer:
All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment below!

More ScamsNOW.com Articles