ScamsNOW!
The SCARS Institute Magazine about Scam Victims-Survivors, Scams, Fraud & Cybercrime
CDA Section 230 Groundbreaking Decision in California Civil Case
Has the Dam Finally Broken or is it just a Leak?
Author:
• SCARS Editorial Team – Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
Article Abstract
NOTE: This article about the Communications Decency Act CDA Section 230 is not intended to be a legal opinion. SCARS is not a law firm nor are licensed attorneys. This is an analysis of this case based on the need to understand the implications for potential future cases and rulings. SCARS has long suggested that social media applications could be considered defective and dangerous products, and we are gratified to see this concept finally emerge in this case.
In the Case of Neville v. Snap – Applying the Communications Decency Act CDA Section 230 in Groundbreaking Decision in California Civil Case
Judge Rejects Snap’s Section 230 Defense in Neville v. Snap
Has the Section 230 immunity Dam Finally Broken or is it just a Leak?
At this Stage of the Case
The complainants, who are parents of individuals using Snapchat and experienced overdoses after buying fentanyl from other Snapchat users, filed a lawsuit against Snapchat, alleging various tort claims. Seeking to overcome the evident Section 230 protection, the plaintiffs employed the common Lemmon v. Snap strategy, asserting their lawsuit centered on Snapchat’s inherent product design decisions rather than the content provided by drug dealers.
Plaintiffs disavow any claim based upon Snap’s activities as a publisher of the third-party (drug seller) content. That is, plaintiffs do not contend that Snap is liable for failing to eliminate or otherwise moderate some or all of the third-party drug sellers’ content. Instead, plaintiffs’ sole focus, they say, is on (1) Snap’s alleged independent tortious conduct and (2) Snapchat (a “feature-packed social media app.”) as a defective product.
The court rejected Snap’s assertion that it was immune because of the CDA Section 230 and rejected Snapchat’s motion to dismiss.
So the question is, does this open the door for similar complaints against other social media platforms to bypass CDA Section 230 immunities?
SCARS Analysis
In the case of Neville v. Snap, parents of Snapchat users who suffered overdoses from fentanyl purchased on the platform sued Snapchat for various tort claims. To overcome Section 230 immunity, they framed the lawsuit around Snap’s first-party product design choices, not the content of the drug dealers.
The judge, deviating unexpectedly, rejected most of Snapchat’s motion to dismiss, arguing that Snap’s alleged independent tortious conduct and Snapchat as a defective product were distinct from the drug sellers’ content. This decision challenges Section 230 jurisprudence, potentially diminishing the immunity’s effectiveness if such doctrinal rephrasing becomes a precedent.
The legal implications for other social media platforms from the Neville v. Snap case are potentially significant, as it challenges the traditional application of Section 230 immunity. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides broad protections to online platforms, shielding them from liability for content posted by users. However, the judge in this case rejected Snap’s Section 230 defense, arguing that the plaintiffs focused on Snap’s alleged independent tortious conduct and the defective nature of Snapchat as a product, rather than the content of the drug dealers.
The Key Legal Implications for other Social Media Platforms
- Increased Scrutiny on Product Design Choices: Platforms may face more scrutiny over their product design choices and features. If plaintiffs can successfully argue that a platform’s design contributes to harm independently of user-generated content, it could open the door to liability.
- Potential Erosion of Section 230 Protections: If the decision in Neville v. Snap sets a precedent, it might encourage plaintiffs to reframe their claims to target platform design and features rather than user-generated content. This could erode the broad immunity that Section 230 has traditionally provided.
- Need for Clarity on Tangibility Distinction: The court’s rejection of the tangible/intangible distinction may lead to confusion regarding the application of product liability claims to online services. Clarity is needed on whether strict product liability laws can be applied to intangible services like social media platforms.
- Impact on Nomenclature Battles: The case highlights the importance of the terms used to describe platforms (e.g., service, app, product). The nomenclature battles could become more critical in determining the applicable legal standards and analogies.
- Potential Appeal and Precedent Setting: The case is likely to be appealed, and the outcome at the appellate level will be crucial. If the decision stands, it may set a precedent that challenges the broad protections traditionally afforded to online platforms under Section 230.
Summary
In summary, the Neville v. Snap case introduces legal uncertainties and potential challenges to the established understanding of Section 230 immunity. Social media platforms should closely monitor developments in this case and consider the implications for their own liability protections.
More:
- Judge Goes Rogue and Rejects Snap’s Section 230 Defense for [Reasons]-Neville v. Snap – Technology & Marketing Law Blog (ericgoldman.org)
- The Ninth Circuit’s Confusing Ruling Over Snapchat’s Speed Filter-Lemmon v. Snap – Technology & Marketing Law Blog (ericgoldman.org)
- Supreme Court’s dodge in Gonzalez v. Google (ericgoldman.org)
- The Communications Decency Act Section 230 Meets The U.S. Supreme Court (romancescamsnow.com)
- CDA Section 230 – Why Facebook & Social Media Largely Ignore Scammers (romancescamsnow.com)
- SCARS Proposed Changes To The Communications Decency Act (againstscams.org)
-/ 30 /-
What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment above!
SCARS LINKS: AgainstScams.org RomanceScamsNOW.com ContraEstafas.org ScammerPhotos.com Anyscam.com ScamsNOW.com
reporting.AgainstScams.org support.AgainstScams.org membership.AgainstScams.org donate.AgainstScams.org shop.AgainstScams.org
youtube.AgainstScams.org linkedin.AgainstScams.org facebook.AgainstScams.org
ARTICLE RATING
TABLE OF CONTENTS
META
CATEGORIES
MOST POPULAR COMMENTED ARTICLES
POPULAR ARTICLES
U.S. & Canada Suicide Lifeline 988
WHAT PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT
LATEST SITE COMMENTS
See Comments for this Article at the Bottom of the Page
on Darkest Before the Dawn – What This Means to Psychological Trauma Sufferers – 2025: “How not to lose hope, not to give up when the darkness grows? What to do in such moments ?…” May 10, 05:03
on Psychological Trauma Or PTSD And Chronic Headaches And Migraines – 2024: “I am so thankful I don’t and haven’t suffered from migraines or tension headaches. I’ve seen in others how debilitating…” May 9, 16:35
on Learning And The Challenges That A Scam Victim Faces From Trauma And Related Cognitive Effects – 2024: “My cognitive impairment was bad right after my scam. However, I have now noticed that it was especially bad during…” May 6, 14:23
on Hate for Scammers and Criminals Feels So Good But is So Bad for Scam Victims – 2025: “This is all true and valid. I had to forgive myself first for trusting my abuser because he hurt my…” May 6, 10:08
on Nirvana and the Path to Letting Go of Suffering – 2025: “En mi experiencia podría describir el nirvana en mi recuperación como ese estado de paz profunda y liberación emocional que…” May 5, 18:58
on Beginning Again and Scam Victim Recovery -2025: “Taking action is the first step to recovery and I am doing that and becoming a newer stronger version of…” May 5, 09:53
Important Information for New Scam Victims
Please visit www.ScamVictimsSupport.org – a SCARS Website for New Scam Victims & Sextortion Victims
SCARS Institute now offers a free recovery program at www.SCARSeducation.org
Please visit www.ScamPsychology.org – to more fully understand the psychological concepts involved in scams and scam victim recovery
If you are looking for local trauma counselors, please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org
If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines
Statement About Victim Blaming
Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and not to blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and help victims avoid scams in the future. At times, this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims; we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.
These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens, and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.
Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org
SCARS INSTITUTE RESOURCES:
IF YOU HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED BY A SCAM OR CYBERCRIME
♦ If you are a victim of scams, go to www.ScamVictimsSupport.org for real knowledge and help
♦ Enroll in SCARS Scam Survivor’s School now at www.SCARSeducation.org
♦ To report criminals, visit https://reporting.AgainstScams.org – we will NEVER give your data to money recovery companies like some do!
♦ Sign up for our free support & recovery help by https://support.AgainstScams.org
♦ Join our WhatsApp Chat Group at: https://chat.whatsapp.com/BPDSYlkdHBbDBg8gfTGb02
♦ Follow us on X: https://x.com/RomanceScamsNow
♦ Follow us and find our podcasts, webinars, and helpful videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RomancescamsNowcom
♦ SCARS Institute Songs for Victim-Survivors: https://www.youtube.com/playlist…
♦ See SCARS Institute Scam Victim Self-Help Books at https://shop.AgainstScams.org
♦ Learn about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org
♦ Dig deeper into the reality of scams, fraud, and cybercrime at www.ScamsNOW.com and www.RomanceScamsNOW.com
♦ Scam Survivor’s Stories: www.ScamSurvivorStories.org
♦ For Scam Victim Advocates visit www.ScamVictimsAdvocates.org
♦ See more scammer photos on www.ScammerPhotos.com
You can also find the SCARS Institute on Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, and TruthSocial
Psychology Disclaimer:
All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only
The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.
Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.
While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.
Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.
If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.
Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here
If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair, please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.
More ScamsNOW.com Articles
A Question of Trust
At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish. Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors’ experience. You can do Google searches, but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.
