Victim & Advocate Personality Dangers to Scam Victims – Including Main Character Syndrome
Main Character Syndrome and the Dangers to Victims Around Them – Avoiding Entanglement with Dangerous Advocates and Other Victims
Primary Category: Scam Victim Recovery Psychology
Intended Audience: Scam Victims-Survivors / Family & Friends / General Public / Others
Authors:
• Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
• Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
About This Article
Navigating the Challenges of Dangerous Personality Types, such as Main Character Syndrome and Pathological Lying in Victims’ Advocacy
Victims of scams or crimes often face profound psychological challenges, including trauma responses that may lead to behaviors such as exaggeration, pathological lying, or the emergence of traits linked to “Main Character Syndrome.” While these behaviors can complicate the victim’s recovery journey, they are often rooted in deep emotional and psychological pain, not malice. This highlights the need for compassion, understanding, and appropriate boundaries in advocacy.
Victims and advocates alike must be vigilant about the potential harm posed by problematic individuals within advocacy spaces, including those with narcissistic tendencies, savior complexes, or unresolved trauma. Such individuals, whether fellow victims or advocates, can unintentionally dominate, manipulate, or distort the recovery process for others. Establishing professional boundaries and ensuring advocates operate ethically and objectively is essential to foster empowerment rather than dependency or harm.
Addressing victims who engage in lying or exaggeration requires a delicate balance of empathy and constructive guidance. Creating a safe, non-judgmental environment, validating their emotions, and emphasizing the power of truth can help them understand that their unembellished story is enough. Encouraging professional therapy can provide the necessary tools to process trauma and rebuild authenticity. Ultimately, a supportive, well-informed approach ensures that victims can heal while minimizing harm to themselves and others within the recovery journey.
Main Character Syndrome and the Dangers to Victims Around Them – Avoiding Entanglement with Dangerous Advocates and Other Victims
This is going to be a cautionary tale about scam victims who exhibit ‘Main Character Syndrome’ or other problematic psychological issues or personality types.
This is going to sound very blaming of these victims, but sadly, they do exist and regular crime or scam victims do need to avoid them because of the harm it can cause to regular victims-survivor’s recovery journey. The pathology of these others is something that is best left up to psychological professionals and specialized therapy.
Hard Truths
Our goal is not to blame or alienate victims of scams but to develop a deeper understanding and awareness of how these crimes and their resulting trauma can manifest in diverse and often unexpected ways. By shedding light on these psychological dynamics, we aim to empower victims to recognize when their thoughts or emotions may be taking a harmful turn that could benefit from professional intervention. At the same time, this knowledge equips others to identify signs of manipulation or control, enabling them to protect themselves and offer informed support to those at risk. Through education and empathy, we can create a safer and more compassionate environment for everyone impacted by these situations.
Introduction – The Dangers
In the complex aftermath of becoming a crime victim, whether it’s through scams or any other form of crime, individuals often seek solace, understanding, and advocacy. However, it’s crucial to approach advocacy or advocates with a discerning eye. Not all advocates are motivated by pure intentions; some may carry their own psychological baggage, which can inadvertently or deliberately (even malevolently) complicate the recovery process for others.
Victims should be wary of advocates who might have suffered similar traumas but possess underlying issues such as narcissism, a savior syndrome or messiah complex, or even malevolent intent. These individuals might have turned to advocacy not to help but as a means to cope with their own unresolved issues or to exert control over others.
Here’s why this can be problematic:
Narcissism: An advocate with narcissistic tendencies might use the platform of victim advocacy to feed their need for admiration or to manipulate situations to their advantage. Their actions might not genuinely prioritize the well-being of victims but rather how they can benefit personally from the scenario.
Savior Syndrome/Messiah Complex: Those with this psychological trait might perceive themselves as the only ones capable of saving victims, often leading to overbearing, controlling behavior. They might discourage victims from seeking other forms of help or from making independent decisions, believing that only their method or guidance is valid. This can stunt a victim’s personal recovery and autonomy.
Malevolent Intent: In rarer, but still significant cases, some advocates might have ulterior motives, perhaps seeking to exploit victims further or to gain control over support groups for personal gain or to perpetuate their own narratives.
Control and Dominance: For some, advocacy becomes a venue to re-establish control lost in their own victimization. They might dominate discussions, dictate recovery paths, or isolate victims from other support systems, which can be more harmful than helpful, as it might mimic the dynamics of the original abusive or exploitative situations.
Victims need to look beyond the surface of advocacy, examining the actions and motivations of those who claim to support them. It’s important to ensure that the advocate is genuinely focused on empowerment and healing, not on perpetuating cycles of dependency or control. This vigilance can help safeguard against further harm and ensure that the path to recovery is one of true restoration and empowerment.
Establishment of Professional Boundaries
Problematic victims or advocates from the categories above will often disregard the important boundaries that are necessary to help victims recover from their experiences.
Professional boundaries in victim’s advocacy are essential for several reasons, ensuring that the support provided is both ethical and effective.
Critical Boundaries
Here’s an exploration of why these boundaries are crucial:
Maintaining Objectivity – Emotional Distance: Advocates need to maintain some emotional distance to remain objective. This objectivity is vital for providing balanced advice, recognizing when more specialized help is needed, and avoiding becoming too personally involved in a victim’s life, which can cloud judgment.
Empowerment vs. Dependency – Restoring Independence: Boundaries prevent advocates from inadvertently fostering dependency. Empowerment means helping victims regain control over their lives, not replacing one form of control (from the perpetrator) with another (from the advocate). Clear boundaries help victims build self-reliance and autonomy.
Ethical Practice – Professional Ethics: Adhering to established ethical guidelines ensures that advocates act in the best interest of the victim without exploiting their vulnerability. This includes confidentiality, respect for autonomy, and avoiding conflicts of interest.
Prevention of Burnout/Recovery Exhaustion: Setting boundaries is also about protecting the advocate’s mental health. The intense nature of advocacy work can lead to burnout if personal limits are not respected. Boundaries help in managing workload, stress, and emotional investment.
Clear Roles and Expectations – Role Clarity: Boundaries delineate what is expected from both the advocate and the victim. This clarity helps prevent misunderstandings about the scope of support, the advocate’s role, and what is realistically achievable in terms of recovery or legal outcomes.
Protection from Vicarious Trauma/Compassion Exhaustion or Secondary Trauma: Advocates are at risk of experiencing secondary trauma or compassion fatigue from deep involvement in victims’ traumatic experiences. Professional boundaries can mitigate this risk by allowing advocates to manage their exposure to trauma narratives.
Maintaining Professionalism – Appropriate Relationships: Boundaries ensure that relationships remain professional. This is crucial to avoid any form of exploitation, whether emotional, financial, or otherwise. It also helps in maintaining the integrity of the advocacy process.
Legal Safety and Confidentiality: In advocacy, especially in cases involving legal proceedings, maintaining boundaries can protect both the victim and the advocate from legal repercussions or threats to personal safety. It ensures that sensitive information is handled with care.
Respect for Neutrality: Boundaries should ignore cultural, personal, and individual differences, ensuring that advocacy treats every victim the same without imposing the advocate’s cultural or personal beliefs.
Ensuring Long-Term Sustainable Support: By managing their own resources and emotional capital, advocates can provide support over the long term, rather than burning out after short, intense periods of involvement.
In practice, setting and maintaining these boundaries might involve:
Clear Communication: Discussing roles, expectations, and limits at the outset of the relationship.
Regular Reflection: Advocates should regularly reflect on their practices and relationships to ensure boundaries are maintained.
Supervision and Support: Engaging in supervision or peer support to discuss challenging cases and boundary issues.
Training: Continuous education on best practices in advocacy, ethics, and self-care.
Ultimately, professional boundaries in victim’s advocacy are not about creating distance for distance’s sake but about creating a framework within which truly effective, ethical, and empowering support can be provided.
Personality & Psychological Issues that Can be Dangerous to Other Victims
In other articles, we have explored some of these other personality types, syndromes, and disorders that can be dangerous for other victims.
Victim Complex:
Savior Syndrome/Messiah Complex:
High Justice Sensitivity:
Cynical Scam Victims:
Haters:
Willing Victims:
Dark Tetrad Personalities
Main Character Syndrome (MCS) – ‘It’s All About Me’
“Main Character Syndrome” (MCS) isn’t an officially recognized psychological disorder or condition in clinical psychology or psychiatry. However, it’s a colloquial term that has gained traction, particularly useful to describe a behavioral pattern where an individual perceives their life as if they are the protagonist in a narrative, much like in movies or books.
Characteristics of Main Character Syndrome:
Here’s a breakdown of what it generally entails:
Heightened Self-Focus: People with MCS often perceive themselves as the center of attention in most situations, regardless of whether it is warranted.
Narrative Thinking: They may interpret life as if it is a movie or story in which they are the protagonist, sometimes exaggerating the importance of their actions or experiences.
Romanticizing Everyday Life: While not inherently negative, some with MCS overly dramatize or idealize mundane events, seeing them as pivotal moments in their ‘story.’
Disregard for Others: In more extreme cases, individuals might dismiss the autonomy or feelings of others, focusing instead on how others’ actions affect their personal stories.
Self-Centered Perspective: Individuals with MCS might see themselves as the center of their world, where everyone else serves as supporting characters or obstacles in their personal stories. This can lead to a lack of empathy or consideration for others’ feelings and experiences.
Narrative Bias: They might interpret events in their life in a way that always casts them in a heroic, victimized, or pivotal role. This can manifest in how they tell stories about their life, emphasizing drama, challenges overcome, or their unique journey.
Attention Seeking: There might be a tendency to behave in ways that draw attention to themself, believing that life should be lived like a spectacle or that they are entitled to others’ attention or sympathy.
Lack of Accountability: Since they see themselves as the main character, there’s sometimes a reluctance to acknowledge personal faults or mistakes, attributing all outcomes to external factors or other people’s actions.
Over-dramatization of Life Events: Everyday occurrences might be blown out of proportion, turning minor inconveniences into plot twists or life-altering events in their personal narrative.
Social Media Influence: With the rise of social media, where people can curate and narrate their lives, MCS might be exacerbated as individuals craft an online persona that’s always in the spotlight, dealing with dramatic ups and downs.
Psychological Context:
Narcissism: Some aspects of MCS overlap with narcissistic traits, where there’s an excessive need for admiration, a sense of entitlement, and a lack of empathy. However, not everyone with MCS would meet the clinical criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Self-Esteem and Identity: It could also reflect struggles with self-esteem or identity, where individuals seek validation through an exaggerated sense of their life’s significance or uniqueness.
Cognitive Distortions: The narrative bias seen in MCS can be likened to cognitive distortions where one’s perception of reality is skewed to fit a particular storyline or role.
Coping Mechanism: For some, this mindset serves as a way to add meaning to their lives or cope with insecurities, loneliness, or a lack of purpose.
Cultural and Media Influence:
The term has become more popular with the increase in self-documentation via social media, where individuals can control their narrative to an extent, often aiming to portray their life as a compelling story.
Media, including movies, TV shows, and books, predominantly feature protagonists with whom viewers are meant to identify, potentially encouraging this kind of self-perception.
While “Main Character Syndrome” isn’t a formal diagnosis, understanding these behaviors can help in personal growth, building empathy, and improving interpersonal relationships. If someone recognizes these traits in themselves or others, it might be beneficial to reflect on how this perception influences interactions and life choices.
Positive and Negative Impacts:
Positive: Encourages self-expression and self-confidence. Helps individuals see themselves as capable of overcoming challenges.
Negative: May strain relationships due to self-absorption. Can lead to a distorted perception of reality or neglect of others’ experiences and emotions.
While MCS is sometimes more a cultural phenomenon than a clinical term, reflecting on its presence in oneself or others can allow greater self-awareness and encourage healthier interpersonal dynamics.
When Victims Transform Into Liars
Psychological trauma acts like a virus, infiltrating the mind and reshaping the very essence of a person into someone unrecognizable from who they once were. It alters perceptions, emotions, and behaviors, often creating a new internal reality that feels disconnected from the past self.
For many, this transformation can be reversed through the healing power of support, self-awareness, and recovery. However, for others, the impact is far more profound, leading to deep-seated psychological issues that demand professional therapy to address.
When victims begin to fabricate or distort their experiences of victimization, it is often a sign that the trauma has compromised their ability to process and communicate reality. In such cases, professional intervention becomes required, not only to untangle the threads of their suffering but to guide them back toward authenticity and stability.
We know this is going to be hard for many victim-survivors to read but understanding that these possibilities exist and what to do about them can be very important.
The Phenomenon
The phenomenon of traumatized crime victims engaging in pathological lying about their experiences is both complex and multifaceted, rooted in a blend of psychological, emotional, and social factors. Trauma disrupts the victim’s sense of reality and identity, often leaving them grappling with overwhelming emotions such as shame, guilt, fear, and anger. In some cases, these intense feelings can distort their ability to process and articulate their experiences accurately. Pathological lying may emerge as an unconscious coping mechanism, where fabricated or exaggerated narratives serve to protect the individual from deeper pain, justify unresolved emotions, or create a sense of control over their story.
Social dynamics can also play a significant role. Victims may feel societal pressure to make their experiences ‘more believable’ or ‘more worthy’ of attention, especially in environments where their trauma might be minimized or dismissed, especially when they lack concrete answers. In some cases, they might embellish their accounts in an attempt to elicit validation or sympathy they feel they have been denied. Conversely, lying could also serve as a defense mechanism to avoid stigma, scrutiny, or feelings of vulnerability associated with disclosing the full truth.
Additionally, the neurological impacts of trauma—such as disruptions to memory formation and recall—can contribute to fragmented or distorted recollections, which might unintentionally evolve into fabricated stories. Over time, repeated retelling of these altered narratives can blur the lines between reality and fiction, reinforcing the pathological lying behavior.
Understanding this phenomenon requires compassion and a nuanced perspective. It highlights the importance of creating supportive environments and accessing professional interventions to help victims navigate their trauma without resorting to maladaptive coping strategies like lying. Through therapy and support, these individuals can begin to reconcile their experiences, rebuild their sense of self, and find healthier ways to communicate and heal.
Contributing Factors
Here are some factors that might contribute to this behavior:
Coping Mechanism – Avoidance and Dissociation: Trauma can lead to dissociation, where a person might disconnect from reality to avoid reliving painful memories. Lying or exaggerating events can be a way to distance oneself from the actual trauma or to control the narrative in a way that feels safer or more manageable.
Control: Trauma often strips individuals of control over their lives. Fabricating or altering details of their story can give them a sense of agency over their narrative, reclaiming some control over how they are perceived or how their story is told.
Need for Validation: After experiencing trauma, victims might feel isolated or invalidated. Fabricating or embellishing stories can garner attention, sympathy, or validation from others, which might be lacking in their real-life experiences post-trauma.
Social Connection: Some might lie to maintain social connections or to ensure they continue receiving support, as the attention might wane once the trauma’s immediate effects are no longer visible.
Victim Identity: For some, the identity of being a ‘victim’ becomes central to their self-concept. This might lead to fabricating new traumas or exaggerating existing ones to maintain this identity, especially if it has brought them previous benefits like support or sympathy.
Secondary Gain: There can be tangible benefits (like financial compensation or special treatment) or intangible ones (like feeling uniquely understood or important) associated with being a victim, which might subconsciously encourage some to perpetuate or exaggerate their victimhood.
Underlying Psychological Disorders:
Pathological Lying (Pseudologia Fantastica): Some individuals might have a predisposition or develop a condition where they habitually lie for no clear external benefit. Trauma can exacerbate this tendency.
Personality Disorders: Conditions like Borderline Personality Disorder or Antisocial Personality Disorder can involve patterns of deceit or manipulation, potentially intensified by trauma.
Memory Distortion:
Trauma and Memory: Traumatic memories can be fragmented or distorted. Over time, the recounting of these events can change, sometimes unintentionally, leading to what might be perceived as lies but are actually the result of how memory functions after trauma.
Social and Cultural Influences:
Media and Public Perception: Exposure to narratives where trauma is dramatized or where victims receive significant attention might influence how one perceives and recounts their own experiences.
Cultural Expectations: In some cultures or communities, there might be pressure to conform to certain narratives of victimhood for acceptance or to fulfill societal roles.
Understanding this behavior requires a compassionate approach, recognizing that lying might not be malicious but rather a symptom of underlying psychological issues stemming from or exacerbated by trauma. Therapy, particularly modalities like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or trauma-focused therapies, can be beneficial in addressing these behaviors by helping individuals process their trauma in healthier ways and reducing the need to lie as a coping mechanism.
However, each case is unique, and professional psychological evaluation is crucial to understanding the specific motivations and providing tailored interventions.
Why do Victims Amplify or Lie About the Victimization – What Need Does It Serve?
Victims might amplify or lie about their victimization due to several underlying psychological, social, and emotional needs:
Validation and Recognition:
Need for Acknowledgment: Many victims feel that their experiences are minimized or ignored. By amplifying or altering the details of their victimization, they might seek greater recognition of their pain and suffering, hoping to be taken seriously or to validate their feelings.
Control and Empowerment:
Regaining Control: Trauma often leaves victims feeling powerless. By controlling the narrative, even if through lies or exaggeration, they might feel they are regaining some control over their life or how they are perceived by others.
Empowerment Through Sympathy: Drawing sympathy can empower victims, giving them a sense of importance or influence in their social circles.
Attention and Support:
Attention Seeking: After the initial shock of trauma subsides, the attention might decrease, leaving victims feeling isolated. Amplifying the story can ensure continued attention, support, or care from friends, family, or even strangers.
Support Networks: Some might feel that only by maintaining or exaggerating their victim status can they keep the support networks active around them.
Coping with Trauma:
Dissociation and Memory: Trauma can lead to dissociation or fragmented memories. Over time, the retelling of events might evolve, not always intentionally, as the mind tries to cope with or make sense of the trauma.
Avoidance of Reality: Facing the full horror of what happened might be too overwhelming, so altering the facts can serve as a psychological shield.
Identity and Self-Perception:
Victim Identity: For some, the identity of being a victim becomes central to their sense of self, especially if it has brought them empathy or resources. There’s a risk of becoming overly attached to this identity, leading to behaviors that reinforce it, including lying or exaggerating.
Secondary Gains:
Material or Social Benefits: There might be tangible benefits like financial compensation, legal advantages, or social support that come with being seen as a more significant victim.
Emotional Benefits: The emotional benefits, like feeling special or uniquely understood, can also play a role.
Fear and Shame:
Fear of Disbelief: Some victims might fear that their true story won’t be believed or will be downplayed, leading them to enhance it to ensure it is taken seriously.
Shame Management: If the trauma involves elements that cause shame or guilt, lying might be a way to reshape the narrative to one that’s less painful or more socially acceptable.
Social and Cultural Context:
Cultural Narratives: In some cultures, there’s an expectation or narrative around victimhood that might pressure individuals to fit into these roles or stories.
Media Influence: The portrayal of victims in media might set a precedent on how victims should “act” or what their stories should look like, influencing personal narratives.
Understanding these needs doesn’t excuse the act of lying but provides insight into the complex psychological landscape victims might navigate post-trauma. Therapeutic interventions focusing on processing trauma, rebuilding identity, and creating genuine connections can help address these underlying needs in healthier ways. However, it is also very important to understand that these behaviors can affect almost anyone who has been traumatized – it is a valid form of trauma response.
7 Steps to Help Scam Victims End the Lies
Helping a crime or scam victim who is amplifying or lying about their experiences requires a careful balance of empathy, patience, and constructive communication. The goal is to provide support while gently guiding them toward understanding that their unaltered truth is valid, will be believed, and is the most effective foundation for healing and resolution.
Note that it is difficult to set aside the lies and the lying from the person and their trauma. When a victim goes off in this direction it can seem like yet another betrayal – first the scam and then after lying about the experience or associated events. However, separating the two is important because, in the end, this is all the result of the trauma that the victim experienced.
Here are some key steps to help:
STEP 1. Create a Safe and Non-Judgmental Space
-
- Empathy First: Show genuine care and understanding. Reassure them that they are not alone and that their feelings are valid.
- Avoid Accusations: Directly accusing them of lying or exaggerating may lead to defensiveness and further entrenchment in their narrative.
- Active Listening: Let them share their story fully, even if you suspect exaggeration. Listening without interruption can help them feel heard and reduce the need to embellish.
STEP 2. Reaffirm Their Value and Validity
-
- Validate Their Experience: Emphasize that they don’t need to amplify their story to be believed. For example, “What you’ve gone through is significant and matters as it is. You don’t need to change anything for it to be important.”
- Acknowledge Their Pain: Often, lies or exaggerations stem from a fear that their actual experience won’t elicit enough concern. Reassure them that their emotions and pain are legitimate, no matter the details.
STEP 3. Focus on the Benefits of Honesty
-
- Highlight the Importance of Truth for Justice or Recovery: If applicable, explain how truthful accounts can strengthen investigations or therapeutic efforts. For example, “The more we stay true to the facts, the more effectively we can help you and hold those responsible accountable.”
- Frame Truth as Empowering: Reinforce that their authenticity is powerful. Lying may feel like control, but truth offers genuine agency and resolution.
STEP 4. Gently Address the Fabrication
-
- Point Out Inconsistencies with Care: If lies or exaggerations are clear, address them gently. For instance, “I noticed a few parts of the story seem to change sometimes. It’s okay if remembering everything is hard, but we can focus on what you’re sure of.”
- Normalize Trauma-Related Memory Gaps: If confusion or distortion stems from trauma, remind them that memory gaps are normal and not a reflection of their credibility.
STEP 5. Encourage Professional Support
-
- Suggest Therapy Without Stigma: Recommend a trauma-informed therapist who can help them process their experience and the reasons behind any fabrications. Frame therapy as a tool for healing, not as punishment or correction.
- Provide Resources: Share information about victim support groups, hotlines, or legal aid organizations that can help them feel supported in their truth.
STEP 6. Build Accountability in a Positive Way
-
- Explain the Impact of Exaggeration: Help them understand that amplifying their story may undermine their credibility and distract from their genuine experience. For example, “Your story as it truly happened is enough, and sticking to the truth ensures people understand what you’ve been through.”
- Encourage Self-Reflection: Create opportunities for them to reflect on why they feel the need to alter their story, without making them feel ashamed.
STEP 7. Be Patient and Consistent
-
- Understand It’s a Process: Changing behavior, especially rooted in trauma, takes time. Be patient and supportive, even if they are resistant initially.
- Reassure Them of Your Support: Remind them repeatedly that your belief in them does not depend on how dramatic or significant their story seems.
By creating trust, validating their emotions, and providing the right resources, along with a healthy dose of boundaries, you can help a victim understand that their unembellished truth is enough and is the key to both their healing and finding justice.
Please Rate This Article
Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.
Leave a Reply
Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.
Recent Reader Comments
on Other Victims & Advocates Personality Dangers to Scam Victims – Including Main Character Syndrome – 2025: “Excelente artículo!!!” Jan 17, 10:36
on Other Victims & Advocates Personality Dangers to Scam Victims – Including Main Character Syndrome – 2025: “Thank you. It is all true.” Jan 17, 03:29
on The Scam Victims Need To Feel Special And How Scammers Exploit This Vulnerability – 2024: “Well, now I know how I got involved. That little girl inside me needing love, was what the criminals “saw”…” Jan 12, 17:14
on Trust: Romance Scams Betrayal And Scam Victims – 2024: “Now that you understand how seriously it can affect you, why don’t you allow others to help you properly. You…” Jan 11, 21:07
on Trust: Romance Scams Betrayal And Scam Victims – 2024: “After having been through this process, for me I can say the further i research the angrier I get, these…” Jan 11, 14:15
on The Suffering of Job and How This Applies to Scam Victims – 2025: “The story of Job is one of the more uplifting stories there is. Resilience, patience and faith can make a…” Jan 9, 19:30
on Theory of Capabilities and Scam Victims – 2025: “Excellent article. Important advice to victims of fraud not to be just passive recipients of the help they receive, but…” Jan 6, 10:37
on Advocates, Saviors, and Haters – Oh My – How People Respond Rightly or Wrongly to Injustice – 2025: “I’m making the transition from the old self to not quite all the way new self. It is uncomfortable and…” Jan 4, 18:36
Did you find this article useful?
If you did, please help the SCARS Institute to continue helping Scam Victims to become Survivors.
Your gift helps us continue our work and help more scam victims to find the path to recovery!
You can give at donate.AgainstScams.org
Important Information for New Scam Victims
- Please visit www.ScamVictimsSupport.org – a SCARS Website for New Scam Victims & Sextortion Victims
- SCARS Institute now offers a free recovery program at www.SCARSeducation.org
- Please visit www.ScamPsychology.org – to more fully understand the psychological concepts involved in scams and scam victim recovery
If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org
If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines
A Question of Trust
At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.
Statement About Victim Blaming
Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.
These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.
Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org
About the Above SCARS Institute Information
The foregoing is not intended to be completed research itself but rather to report on SCARS Institute’s ongoing research and to offer suggestions to other institutions regarding areas where additional research might be conducted. This summary aims to highlight key findings and propose potential avenues for further investigation, contributing to a broader understanding of the subject matter and encouraging continued exploration within the field.
If you would like more information or to collaborate on research studies or projects please contact the SCARS Institute at contact@AgainstScams.org
SCARS Resources:
- Getting Started: ScamVictimsSupport.org
- FREE enrollment in the SCARS Institute training programs for scam victims SCARSeducation.org
- For New Victims of Relationship Scams newvictim.AgainstScams.org
- Subscribe to SCARS Newsletter newsletter.againstscams.org
- Sign up for SCARS professional support & recovery groups, visit support.AgainstScams.org
- Find competent trauma counselors or therapists, visit counseling.AgainstScams.org
- Become a SCARS Member and get free counseling benefits, visit membership.AgainstScams.org
- Report each and every crime, learn how to at reporting.AgainstScams.org
- Learn more about Scams & Scammers at RomanceScamsNOW.com and ScamsNOW.com
- Learn more about the Psychology of Scams and Scam Victims: ScamPsychology.org
- Self-Help Books for Scam Victims are at shop.AgainstScams.org
- Worldwide Crisis Hotlines: International Suicide Hotlines – OpenCounseling : OpenCounseling
- Campaign To End Scam Victim Blaming – 2024 (scamsnow.com)
Psychology Disclaimer:
All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only
The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.
Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.
While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.
Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.
If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.
Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here
If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.
-/ 30 /-
What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment below!
Excelente artÃculo!!!
Thank you.
It is all true.