Price’s Law and Scam Fraud & Cybercrime Awareness Education

Applying Price’s Law to Scam Awareness: Why Anti-Scam Education Often Fails

Primary Category: Advocacy and Policy

Authors:
•  Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

While Price’s Law highlights the limitations of broad anti-scam awareness campaigns, understanding this phenomenon can help refine and improve educational efforts.

By focusing on the highly engaged minority and creating more targeted, compelling content, organizations can increase the chances of success in their fight against scams and fraud. Though the majority may not engage meaningfully, leveraging the power of the informed few can drive significant change.

Price's Law and Scam Fraud & Cybercrime Awareness Education - 2024

Applying Price’s Law to Scam Awareness: Why Anti-Scam Education Often Fails

Price’s Law is a concept suggesting that the square root of a population is responsible for the majority of productive outcomes. When applied to anti-scam awareness education, this law offers a revealing insight: despite widespread campaigns and efforts to educate the public about fraud and cybercrime, only a small fraction—roughly the square root of those exposed—are likely to genuinely engage and absorb the information.

For instance, if 10,000 people are reached by an awareness initiative, only about 100 individuals (the square root of 10,000) will truly understand, internalize, and apply the knowledge. This disproportionately small group of aware individuals suggests that the majority of the population remains either uninformed, disengaged, or uninterested, despite being exposed to the educational content.

This limitation poses significant challenges for organizations, government bodies, and activists working to prevent fraud. With such a small portion of the audience taking actionable steps, many remain vulnerable to scams, explaining the persistent rise of cybercrime and fraud despite the ongoing awareness campaigns.

Why Price’s Law Explains the Failure of Anti-Scam Education

One key reason for the limited success of awareness campaigns is the overwhelming amount of information individuals are bombarded with daily. Scam-related education competes with other priorities, distractions, and misinformation. Many people dismiss the possibility that they could be scammed, thinking it will never happen to them or believing they already know enough to avoid it.

This general complacency is one of the hurdles Price’s Law points to: most of the population doesn’t engage meaningfully with scam education because they don’t see it as immediately relevant. Those who do, as predicted by Price’s Law, are the minority who are either proactive about safety, have experienced a scam, or are naturally more inquisitive and informed.

Furthermore, cybercriminals are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their techniques, making it harder for the unengaged majority to detect scams, even when they’ve been educated. This complexity widens the gap between those who understand the threat (the minority) and those who remain at risk (the majority).

Price’s Law: The Mathematical Basis and Its Application to Awareness Campaigns

Price’s Law, developed by British physicist Derek J. de Solla Price, is a principle that suggests that a small percentage of people are responsible for the majority of outcomes in any given group or system. The law posits that the square root of the number of people involved produces half of the output. For example, if 100 individuals work in a group, roughly 10 of them will produce 50% of the results.

This law has broader applications in various fields such as scientific productivity, business output, and even in societal contributions. The core of Price’s Law is based on the understanding that in any system, talent, productivity, or engagement is unevenly distributed. In practice, this means a minority of individuals contribute disproportionately to a project’s or system’s success.

The Pareto Principle and Price’s Law

Price’s Law is closely related to the Pareto Principle (the 80/20 rule), which suggests that 20% of efforts produce 80% of results. However, Price’s Law takes this further by introducing a square root factor, indicating that as the population or group size grows, the disparity between active contributors and the majority widens even further.

This mathematical insight can serve as a guiding principle for those in the fields of education and awareness. Instead of focusing efforts solely on reaching everyone, it can be more effective to tailor content to the engaged few who are more likely to act and then empower them to spread the message.

How It Applies to Anti-Scam Awareness Campaigns

When applied to awareness education, especially in fields like scam prevention, Price’s Law suggests that only a small fraction of the population will internalize and actively engage with the educational material. Suppose an organization launches an anti-scam campaign targeting 10,000 individuals. Price’s Law predicts that roughly 100 (the square root of 10,000) people will fully absorb the message and act upon it by taking preventive measures or sharing the information.

This discrepancy helps explain why widespread educational campaigns, no matter how well-executed, often fail to generate significant behavioral change across large populations. The reality is that most people either ignore, dismiss, or are indifferent to the information provided, leaving only a small, proactive subset of individuals who engage and protect themselves against scams.

Improving the Reach and Practical Implications for Scam Awareness

While Price’s Law presents a discouraging outlook, it also emphasizes the importance of maximizing the impact on the small engaged group. Here are ways to improve the reach and effectiveness of awareness education:

  1. Target the Engaged Few: Since only a small fraction will truly absorb the information, focus on empowering this group. Provide them with tools and knowledge that they can use to educate others, effectively multiplying the impact of awareness through peer education.
  2. Empower the Active Few: Recognize that only a small group will actively engage with scam prevention efforts. Focus on giving this group the resources to further educate others.
  3. Targeted Awareness: Rather than spreading efforts thinly across entire populations, target groups most likely to engage—such as high-risk industries, tech-savvy individuals, or those who have experienced scams before.
  4. Tailor Content to Specific Groups: Instead of generic campaigns, use targeted messaging to appeal to individuals more likely to be receptive—those in high-risk industries, tech-savvy individuals, or people who have previously encountered scams.
  5. Leverage Emotional Appeal: Make scam education more engaging by sharing real-life stories, testimonials from victims, and emotional appeals. This can drive deeper engagement by showing the consequences of ignoring scam risks.
  6. Simplify Complex Information: Many people disengage when information feels too complex or irrelevant. By simplifying and directly relating content to real-life situations, more people may find it relatable and applicable.
  7. Maximize Engagement through Peers: Encouraging a grassroots approach where educated individuals become advocates for scam prevention in their communities can multiply the effect of awareness campaigns.
  8. Ongoing Campaigns, Not One-Offs: Consistent exposure over time can help combat disengagement. Repeated, digestible messages may eventually break through to those who didn’t engage initially. While broad campaigns are less effective at reaching everyone, repeated exposure to scam awareness through multiple touchpoints (media, workshops, online platforms) can gradually increase the size of the engaged audience.

Understanding the limitations of traditional education efforts, especially in scam awareness, can lead to more effective strategies.

Conclusion: Adapting to the Reality of Limited Engagement

Price’s Law sheds light on the limitations of broad awareness campaigns, particularly in areas like scam and fraud prevention. Recognizing that only a small proportion of individuals will internalize and act upon educational content can lead to more targeted, effective strategies. By focusing on empowering the engaged few, organizations can amplify their message and create a more informed and vigilant public. This understanding can help refine future educational efforts, allowing for a more realistic approach to public education and awareness.

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

Did you find this article useful?

If you did, please help the SCARS Institute to continue helping Scam Victims to become Survivors.

Your gift helps us continue our work and help more scam victims to find the path to recovery!

You can give at donate.AgainstScams.org

Important Information for New Scam Victims

If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org

If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

SCARS Resources:

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

PLEASE NOTE: Psychology Clarification

The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:

  • Diagnosis: The diagnosis of mental, emotional, or brain disorders and related behaviors.
  • Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that focuses on helping individuals to understand and resolve unconscious conflicts.
  • Hypnosis: Hypnosis is a state of trance in which individuals are more susceptible to suggestion. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including anxiety, depression, and pain.
  • Biofeedback: Biofeedback is a type of therapy that teaches individuals to control their bodily functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety, and pain.
  • Behavioral analysis: Behavioral analysis is a type of therapy that focuses on changing individuals’ behaviors. It is often used to treat conditions such as autism and ADHD.
    Neuropsychology: Neuropsychology is a type of psychology that focuses on the relationship between the brain and behavior. It is often used to assess and treat cognitive impairments caused by brain injuries or diseases.

SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.

SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.

SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.

It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX-RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2023 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org