Price’s Law and Scam Fraud & Cybercrime Awareness Education

Applying Price’s Law to Scam Awareness: Why Anti-Scam Education Often Fails

Primary Category: Advocacy and Policy

Authors:
•  Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist, Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D., DFin, MCPO, MAnth – Anthropologist, Scientist, Polymath, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

While Price’s Law highlights the limitations of broad anti-scam awareness campaigns, understanding this phenomenon can help refine and improve educational efforts.

By focusing on the highly engaged minority and creating more targeted, compelling content, organizations can increase the chances of success in their fight against scams and fraud. Though the majority may not engage meaningfully, leveraging the power of the informed few can drive significant change.

Applying Price’s Law to Scam Awareness: Why Anti-Scam Education Often Fails

Price’s Law is a concept suggesting that the square root of a population is responsible for the majority of productive outcomes. When applied to anti-scam awareness education, this law offers a revealing insight: despite widespread campaigns and efforts to educate the public about fraud and cybercrime, only a small fraction—roughly the square root of those exposed—are likely to genuinely engage and absorb the information.

For instance, if 10,000 people are reached by an awareness initiative, only about 100 individuals (the square root of 10,000) will truly understand, internalize, and apply the knowledge. This disproportionately small group of aware individuals suggests that the majority of the population remains either uninformed, disengaged, or uninterested, despite being exposed to the educational content.

This limitation poses significant challenges for organizations, government bodies, and activists working to prevent fraud. With such a small portion of the audience taking actionable steps, many remain vulnerable to scams, explaining the persistent rise of cybercrime and fraud despite the ongoing awareness campaigns.

Why Price’s Law Explains the Failure of Anti-Scam Education

One key reason for the limited success of awareness campaigns is the overwhelming amount of information individuals are bombarded with daily. Scam-related education competes with other priorities, distractions, and misinformation. Many people dismiss the possibility that they could be scammed, thinking it will never happen to them or believing they already know enough to avoid it.

This general complacency is one of the hurdles Price’s Law points to: most of the population doesn’t engage meaningfully with scam education because they don’t see it as immediately relevant. Those who do, as predicted by Price’s Law, are the minority who are either proactive about safety, have experienced a scam, or are naturally more inquisitive and informed.

Furthermore, cybercriminals are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their techniques, making it harder for the unengaged majority to detect scams, even when they’ve been educated. This complexity widens the gap between those who understand the threat (the minority) and those who remain at risk (the majority).

Price’s Law: The Mathematical Basis and Its Application to Awareness Campaigns

Price’s Law, developed by British physicist Derek J. de Solla Price, is a principle that suggests that a small percentage of people are responsible for the majority of outcomes in any given group or system. The law posits that the square root of the number of people involved produces half of the output. For example, if 100 individuals work in a group, roughly 10 of them will produce 50% of the results.

This law has broader applications in various fields such as scientific productivity, business output, and even in societal contributions. The core of Price’s Law is based on the understanding that in any system, talent, productivity, or engagement is unevenly distributed. In practice, this means a minority of individuals contribute disproportionately to a project’s or system’s success.

The Pareto Principle and Price’s Law

Price’s Law is closely related to the Pareto Principle (the 80/20 rule), which suggests that 20% of efforts produce 80% of results. However, Price’s Law takes this further by introducing a square root factor, indicating that as the population or group size grows, the disparity between active contributors and the majority widens even further.

This mathematical insight can serve as a guiding principle for those in the fields of education and awareness. Instead of focusing efforts solely on reaching everyone, it can be more effective to tailor content to the engaged few who are more likely to act and then empower them to spread the message.

How It Applies to Anti-Scam Awareness Campaigns

When applied to awareness education, especially in fields like scam prevention, Price’s Law suggests that only a small fraction of the population will internalize and actively engage with the educational material. Suppose an organization launches an anti-scam campaign targeting 10,000 individuals. Price’s Law predicts that roughly 100 (the square root of 10,000) people will fully absorb the message and act upon it by taking preventive measures or sharing the information.

This discrepancy helps explain why widespread educational campaigns, no matter how well-executed, often fail to generate significant behavioral change across large populations. The reality is that most people either ignore, dismiss, or are indifferent to the information provided, leaving only a small, proactive subset of individuals who engage and protect themselves against scams.

Improving the Reach and Practical Implications for Scam Awareness

While Price’s Law presents a discouraging outlook, it also emphasizes the importance of maximizing the impact on the small engaged group. Here are ways to improve the reach and effectiveness of awareness education:

1. Target the Engaged Few: Since only a small fraction will truly absorb the information, focus on empowering this group. Provide them with tools and knowledge that they can use to educate others, effectively multiplying the impact of awareness through peer education.
2. Empower the Active Few: Recognize that only a small group will actively engage with scam prevention efforts. Focus on giving this group the resources to further educate others.
3. Targeted Awareness: Rather than spreading efforts thinly across entire populations, target groups most likely to engage—such as high-risk industries, tech-savvy individuals, or those who have experienced scams before.
4. Tailor Content to Specific Groups: Instead of generic campaigns, use targeted messaging to appeal to individuals more likely to be receptive—those in high-risk industries, tech-savvy individuals, or people who have previously encountered scams.
5. Leverage Emotional Appeal: Make scam education more engaging by sharing real-life stories, testimonials from victims, and emotional appeals. This can drive deeper engagement by showing the consequences of ignoring scam risks.
6. Simplify Complex Information: Many people disengage when information feels too complex or irrelevant. By simplifying and directly relating content to real-life situations, more people may find it relatable and applicable.
7. Maximize Engagement through Peers: Encouraging a grassroots approach where educated individuals become advocates for scam prevention in their communities can multiply the effect of awareness campaigns.
8. Ongoing Campaigns, Not One-Offs: Consistent exposure over time can help combat disengagement. Repeated, digestible messages may eventually break through to those who didn’t engage initially. While broad campaigns are less effective at reaching everyone, repeated exposure to scam awareness through multiple touchpoints (media, workshops, online platforms) can gradually increase the size of the engaged audience.

Understanding the limitations of traditional education efforts, especially in scam awareness, can lead to more effective strategies.

Conclusion: Adapting to the Reality of Limited Engagement

Price’s Law sheds light on the limitations of broad awareness campaigns, particularly in areas like scam and fraud prevention. Recognizing that only a small proportion of individuals will internalize and act upon educational content can lead to more targeted, effective strategies. By focusing on empowering the engaged few, organizations can amplify their message and create a more informed and vigilant public. This understanding can help refine future educational efforts, allowing for a more realistic approach to public education and awareness.

Please Rate This Article

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?
Please share your thoughts in a comment above!