Cultural Cognition And Its Impact On Scam Victims And Scams

Part 1

Understanding the Effects that Culture Can Have on Cognition Before and During Scam Victimization

Primary Category: Psychology of Scams

Author:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

About This Article

Cultural cognition theory is a framework that explores how individuals’ cultural values and social backgrounds shape their perceptions of risk, facts, and policy preferences. This theory, developed by scholars such as Dan Kahan and Donald Braman, suggests that people process information in ways that reinforce their pre-existing beliefs, which are deeply influenced by their cultural affiliations.

These cultural worldviews typically fall along dimensions such as hierarchy versus egalitarianism and individualism versus communitarianism. For example, people with hierarchical and individualistic worldviews might downplay environmental risks to avoid supporting regulations that could threaten social structures or individual freedoms, while those with egalitarian and communitarian values may emphasize such risks due to their belief in collective responsibility.

Cultural cognition explains why different groups interpret the same evidence differently, often leading to polarization on contentious issues. This cognitive bias results from individuals’ motivation to protect their cultural identities, leading them to accept information that aligns with their beliefs and dismiss or reinterpret information that challenges them. Understanding cultural cognition is crucial for developing effective communication strategies and policy interventions that resonate with diverse cultural groups.

Cultural Cognition And Its Impact On Scam Victims And Scams - 2024

Cultural Cognition Refers to the Theory that Individuals’ Cultural Values and Social Backgrounds Influence their Perceptions of Risk, Facts, and Policy Preferences

Cultural Cognition theory suggests that people process information in a way that reinforces their pre-existing beliefs and values, which are shaped by their cultural affiliations.

Introduction to Cultural Cognition Theory

Cultural cognition theory is a framework that explains how individuals’ cultural values and group identities shape their perceptions of risk, facts, and policy preferences. Developed by scholars such as Dan Kahan and Donald Braman, this theory posits that people interpret information in a way that aligns with their cultural worldviews, which are deeply ingrained sets of beliefs about how society should be structured. These worldviews typically fall along two dimensions: hierarchy vs. egalitarianism and individualism vs. communitarianism.

For instance, people with hierarchical and individualistic worldviews might be more inclined to downplay environmental risks because acknowledging such risks could lead to regulations that threaten existing social structures or individual freedoms. Conversely, those with egalitarian and communitarian values might emphasize these risks because they align with their belief in collective responsibility and the need for equitable societal change.

Cultural cognition also explains why different groups interpret the same piece of evidence in drastically different ways. This happens because individuals are motivated to protect their cultural identities, leading them to accept information that reinforces their existing beliefs while dismissing or reinterpreting information that challenges them. This cognitive bias can result in polarization on contentious issues like climate change, gun control, or healthcare, as people become more entrenched in their positions based on their cultural affiliations rather than a shared understanding of the facts.

Key Concepts of Cultural Cognition

Cultural Worldviews: According to the cultural cognition theory, people have different worldviews that guide their understanding of societal issues. These worldviews are typically categorized into two dimensions:

Hierarchy vs. Egalitarianism: This dimension reflects the degree to which individuals support a structured, stratified society versus one that values equality and reduced social hierarchies.

Individualism vs. Communitarianism: This dimension reflects the preference for individual autonomy versus the belief in collective responsibility and community-focused values.

Biased Assimilation: Cultural cognition leads to biased assimilation, where people accept information that aligns with their cultural worldview and reject information that contradicts it. This results in polarization on issues where different cultural groups have opposing views, such as climate change, gun control, or healthcare.

Identity-Protective Cognition: Individuals are motivated to process information in ways that protect their cultural identities. When confronted with evidence that contradicts their group’s views, they reject or reinterpret that evidence to avoid cognitive dissonance, thereby preserving their cultural identity.

Cultural Credibility: People are more likely to trust information from sources they perceive as sharing their cultural values. This credibility can significantly affect how information is received and processed, influencing public opinion and policy debates.

Applications and Implications

Cultural cognition has profound implications for public policy, communication strategies, and understanding societal divisions. It suggests that simply presenting factual information is not sufficient to change people’s beliefs on contentious issues. Instead, effective communication might require framing messages in a way that resonates with the cultural values of different groups, or using credible sources from within those cultural groups to convey information.

Cultural Cognition and Relationship Scams

Cultural cognition plays a significant role in how individuals perceive and respond to relationship scams, including romance scams and cryptocurrency investment scams. This concept helps explain why certain individuals might be more susceptible to these types of fraud based on their cultural values, worldviews, and the influence of their social environment.

Influence of Cultural Worldviews on Trust and Risk Perception

Trust in Relationships: In cultures that place a high value on community and interpersonal relationships, individuals will be more likely to trust others, even in online interactions. This trust can be exploited by scammers who pose as potential romantic partners or business associates, creating scenarios that align with the victim’s cultural expectations of relationships and trustworthiness.

Perception of Risk: Cultural cognition influences how individuals perceive risks associated with online interactions. For example, individuals from cultures that emphasize community and collective responsibility will be less skeptical of online interactions, viewing them through a lens of trust and social harmony. This can make them more vulnerable to relationship scams, where scammers exploit these cultural values to build trust and manipulate the victim.

Role in Romance Scams

Emotional Manipulation: Romance scammers often tailor their approaches based on the cultural values of their targets. For instance, in cultures where marriage and family are highly valued, scammers present themselves as seeking a serious, long-term relationship or marriage, which can resonate strongly with the victim’s cultural beliefs. This alignment with cultural expectations can lower the victim’s defenses, making them more susceptible to manipulation.

Cultural Norms and Shame: Victims from cultures that stigmatize singlehood or place a strong emphasis on finding a partner are more eager to engage with potential romantic interests online. Scammers exploit this by creating scenarios that fulfill the victim’s cultural desires, which can lead to feelings of shame and self-blame when the scam is revealed, further entrenching the emotional damage.

Role in Cryptocurrency Investment Scams

Cultural Attitudes Toward Wealth and Investment: In cultures where wealth accumulation and financial success are highly valued, individuals are more prone to investment scams, including cryptocurrency fraud. Scammers often appeal to the victim’s desire for financial security or rapid wealth accumulation, aligning their schemes with the cultural belief in the importance of financial success.

Perception of Financial Opportunities: In some cultures, there is a greater openness to risk-taking in pursuit of financial gain, especially if the investment opportunity appears innovative or cutting-edge, such as cryptocurrency. Scammers exploit this cultural inclination by presenting the investment as an exclusive, high-reward opportunity, often downplaying the risks involved.

Cultural Credibility and the Role of Social Proof

Social Proof and Trust: Scammers often exploit the concept of social proof by creating fake testimonials, and endorsements, or by impersonating credible figures within a cultural group. If a scam appears to be endorsed by someone within the victim’s cultural group or community, the victim can be more likely to trust the scam and overlook potential red flags.

Cultural Messaging: Messages that align with the victim’s cultural values and beliefs are more likely to be accepted without skepticism. For instance, if a cryptocurrency investment scam is framed within a narrative of empowerment, financial independence, or technological progress—values highly regarded in certain cultures—can be more persuasive to individuals from those backgrounds.

Impact of Cultural Identity on Scam Vulnerability and Recovery

Identity-Protective Cognition: Victims may resist acknowledging they have been scammed if doing so threatens their cultural identity or values. For example, admitting to falling for a romance scam conflicts with cultural notions of personal integrity or wisdom, leading to denial or underreporting.

Recovery and Stigma: Cultural factors can also influence the recovery process. In cultures where there is significant stigma associated with being scammed, victims will be less likely to seek help or report the crime, exacerbating the emotional and psychological impact of the scam.

Conclusion

Cultural cognition deeply influences how individuals perceive and respond to relationship scams. Scammers often tailor their approaches to align with the cultural values and worldviews of their targets, making their schemes more convincing and effective. Understanding the role of cultural cognition can help in designing better prevention strategies and support systems for victims, taking into account the cultural contexts that shape their experiences and responses to scams.

Research and Examples:

The concept of cultural cognition has been widely studied in fields such as psychology, political science, and public health. For example, research has shown that individuals’ beliefs about climate change, vaccination, and nuclear power are strongly influenced by their cultural worldviews rather than by scientific consensus.

In summary, cultural cognition explains how deeply held cultural values shape the way individuals interpret information and form beliefs, often leading to persistent societal divides on key issues. Understanding this concept can help in designing more effective communication and policy interventions that account for these cultural differences.

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

Did you find this article useful?

If you did, please help the SCARS Institute to continue helping Scam Victims to become Survivors.

Your gift helps us continue our work and help more scam victims to find the path to recovery!

You can give at donate.AgainstScams.org

Important Information for New Scam Victims

If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org

If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

SCARS Resources:

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

PLEASE NOTE: Psychology Clarification

The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:

  • Diagnosis: The diagnosis of mental, emotional, or brain disorders and related behaviors.
  • Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that focuses on helping individuals to understand and resolve unconscious conflicts.
  • Hypnosis: Hypnosis is a state of trance in which individuals are more susceptible to suggestion. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including anxiety, depression, and pain.
  • Biofeedback: Biofeedback is a type of therapy that teaches individuals to control their bodily functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety, and pain.
  • Behavioral analysis: Behavioral analysis is a type of therapy that focuses on changing individuals’ behaviors. It is often used to treat conditions such as autism and ADHD.
    Neuropsychology: Neuropsychology is a type of psychology that focuses on the relationship between the brain and behavior. It is often used to assess and treat cognitive impairments caused by brain injuries or diseases.

SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.

SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.

SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.

It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX-RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2023 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org